From: "Jeff DeMaagd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- Magic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: PrinceGaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Just to re-assure the guy who wondered a couple of
> nights ago if I was still alive, yep I am, and so is
> my PC (which given my recent overclocking trials is
> perhaps su
--- Magic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but having large scale server systems in a
living room isn't exactly practical. FOr one thing
they're quite large and they also get very hot.<
Hmmm... Every major processor type I know about was
available in a slimline desktop or workstation, and
yo
From: Jeff DeMaagd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: MD: Overclocking - definitely OT
> OOOH, a 13% speed increase. Can you even notice it
> without timing something?
Yes. It saves me around 48 hours on
--- Magic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: PrinceGaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Just to re-assure the guy who wondered a couple of
nights ago if I was still alive, yep I am, and so is
my PC (which given my recent overclocking trials is
perhaps surprising). The AMD K6-3/400 chip in my
machine is r
From: PrinceGaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 6:52 PM
Subject: MD: Overclocking
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Just to re-assure the guy who wondered a couple of nights ago if I
> was still alive, yep I am, and so is m
Hi guys,
Just to re-assure the guy who wondered a couple of nights ago if I
was still alive, yep I am, and so is my PC (which given my recent
overclocking trials is perhaps surprising). The AMD K6-3/400 chip
in my machine is running happily at 450 but I did try earlier today to
up the multiplie
> Still a k6-3/450 is faster than any Celeron, and probably about as
> fast as a P3/500 if not faster. At least I believe a given speed K6-3
> outperforms the same speed P3.
though i don't think this subject's fitting for the mailinglist, i think you
have to be corrected on this:-) being a cele
Thanks Shawn,
I've joined deja.com and found several groups with fascinating and
relevant discussions. You may consider me suitably chastised and
all further CPU and related questions will go there. Indeed I may now
very rarely post to md-l except when I have something "interesting" to
offer.
PrinceGaz wrote:
>
> Just to re-assure the guy who wondered a couple of nights ago if I
> was still alive, yep I am, and so is my PC (which given my recent
> overclocking trials is perhaps surprising). The AMD K6-3/400 chip
> in my machine is running happily at 450 but I did try earlier today t
Thanks guys,
I'm now running the K6-3/400 at 450mhz (clocked at 4.5x 100 bus) and
it is perfectly stable. The CPU temp is only a couple of degC higher than
before (now 43 degC). I can't really notice much difference but well...
I guess its doing something.
Next time (probably a week or so) I'
PrinceGaz wrote:
> Next time (probably a week or so) I'll go for broke and try 500mhz (5x
> 100 bus). I don't think it'll like it but its worth a try I guess. It's quite
> obvious the K6-3 is not locked to any clock multiplier so its a case of
> how high can the multiplier go?
If it's anythin
=== The original message was multipart MIME===
=== All non-text parts (attachments) have been removed ===
if your soundcard lock up even at 37mhz fsb, then you can't change the =
fsb to anything higher than the 66mhz spec. ( and doesn't matter if you =
change to a different mb) t
[To avoid arguments, pls reply direct to me, not thro md-l]
Hi,
I guess most of us here are highly intelligent guys (?) so I thought
I'd throw this question to you. It is sorta relevant as more processor
power helps with MP3 crunching.
I want to overclock my CPU, but using the BIOS setup opti
13 matches
Mail list logo
