Leon writes:
<< I've gone back to my SP equipments frequently, because I don't perceive LP2
to be as full-bodied as SP. >>
Agreed. SP is not as rich. In the office, or on an airplane (even with
noise suppresion devices like Etymotic earphones) when it is essentially
background music, one i
> Sure I was lured by the idea of titling. But that has
> become such a chore that I haven't really kept up with
> it.
It's a chore no more if you have WinRemote and a Sony
home deck with an IR remote. (and a PC of course :)
Martin's program is just "the duck's nuts", I wouldn't
title any o
I got started with MD to make compilations of LPs to play in my car. But
lately, in addition to music, I've been recording interviews with family
members for a genealogy project. One of my friends at work borrowed my
recorder and mics for a weekend to record some of his relatives and was
hooked
Kenwood, when they renamed themselves Kenwood and came up with a new image,
found out from market research that a lot of us - the younger crowd, if
noone else - don't really care that much about sound quality. This was 20
years ago.
This may explain why Kenwood is where they are today, while Sa
James writes:
<< As you can see here, I have revised that
position somewhat to say convenience, but not at the
expense of sound.>>
This is where MDLP shines, especially LP2. When I play 80 min MD's in the
office now after having LP2 for a while, it surprises me how soon I have to
change di
TO respond to Larry's post about why to use MD, my
primary reason for going to MD was storage space. I
have over 1,700 CDs. Everytime we have moved, it was
a major project to build shelves to store the CDs. In
fact, I still have to build another set of shelves in
the house that we have been in
James Jarvie wrote,
| I just bought a Sharp MT-15 (my first venture into the world of MDs). I
| made a recording on Saturday with which I am very disappointed. The
| recording came from a very well recorded cassette. I patched the RCA
| cables from the cassette into the minidisc input of the
From: James Jarvie
> The recording came from a very well recorded
> cassette. I patched the RCA cables from the
> cassette into the minidisc input of the MD,
> and made my first recording. The quality
> stinks.
I'm at a loss to explain what went wrong in the dub of the cassette to
minidisc Ja
--- James Jarvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question: Is the compression responsible for the
terrible quality recording? Is it that I started with
an analogue source (still a bad thing because I want
to record many analogue sources as noted above).
Audio Quality must be close to a CD or I
First, I need to add my 2 cents on the issue of why
MD: Audio Quality or Portablility. For me,
portability is not the reason for going MD. I have a
CD player in the car, and a portable, and both do me
quite nicely, thank you. Audio Quality is, of
course,important. But again , if it were the o
10 matches
Mail list logo
