* Dan Frakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 30 Jul 2000
| Hmmm... that raises an interesting moral/legal discussion. If I have paid
| for a song, can I justify copying an alternate version of that song
| without paying for it? What if a DJ/mixer was paid to remix the song, or
| there were alternate
las <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2) I'd put money that I could go to Virgin records here in S.F. and
>> either find the stuff you mentioned on the racks, or could order them and
>> get them within a week.
>
>Which version?? How many CD's are you going to have to buy to get the
>10 songs that yo
Dan Frakes wrote:
>
I think that you would lose that bet. If you say the "songs" meaning some
version of the song, maybe 50 to 75%. Maybe. But you would probably have to buy
75 to 100 CD just to get 100 individual songs.
But Napster offers something that you have no why of knowing about jus
"Link :-7" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>To quote you my friend (using that lightly)
That's not necessary... just because people disagree, we don't need to
disparage each other.
>Of course that's all your opinion, and has nothing to do with whether
>or not Napster is involved in copyright infri
Hi List,
I'm sorry, I know this isn't pretty.
>Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 23:27:36 -0700
>From: Dan Frakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: MD: Napster and my venting
>
>"Link :-7" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What has the recording industry done for me? They've saturated the
> >Media with sh|t m
