Re: MD: Fair Use

2000-04-30 Thread Stainless Steel Rat
* Neon John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 29 Apr 2000 | Actually it is the Audio Home Recording act, Yeah, I goofed on the name. -- Rat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\ Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ -

RE: MD: Fair Use

2000-04-29 Thread Tony Antoniou
Let's not start a lifelong thread again. But to make Austin's point a little clearer, as per copyright law (in simple terms): You are entitled to one backup copy of each original piece of intellectual property that you have purchased and own as such. So if you buy a CD (be it audio or data), you

RE: MD: Fair Use

2000-04-29 Thread Norlin, Chris
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 11:41 AM To: MD-L Subject: Re: MD: Fair Use * "Norlin, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 28 Apr 2000 | Not to quibble over details - but I think the notion that copying a CD to MD | for personal use legal is based loosely on cas

Re: MD: Fair Use

2000-04-29 Thread Neon John
Stainless Steel Rat wrote: > > * "Norlin, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 28 Apr 2000 > | Not to quibble over details - but I think the notion that copying a CD to MD > | for personal use legal is based loosely on case law and not on "fair use". > > Actually, it specifically falls under the

Re: MD: Fair Use

2000-04-28 Thread Stainless Steel Rat
* "Norlin, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 28 Apr 2000 | Not to quibble over details - but I think the notion that copying a CD to MD | for personal use legal is based loosely on case law and not on "fair use". Actually, it specifically falls under the AHRA (American Home Recording Act) and