Re: MD: SCMS strippers

2000-07-18 Thread David W. Tamkin
Dodge wrote, | I need an SCMS stripper to copy my OWN stuff for friends... | Then there's no fuss about copyright, or is there ? You're absolutely right. What SCMS permits or prohibits does not line up with what copyright law permits and prohibits. SCMS isn't for enforcing copyright law; it's

Re: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-14 Thread Stories
>>I'm going to New-York next week, and i want to bring back a SCMS stripper >>Does anyone have an adress of a shop in NY ? >>I wanna bring it back from the US with me, because you can't find it anywhere >>over here ! (Belgium) > >As far as I know they are illegal in this country. Even people

Re: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-13 Thread J. Coon
yep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I thought "pro" equipment ignored teh SCMS bits > Thus all "pro" equipment in effect has SCMS strippers > built in... > > - > To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word >

Re: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-13 Thread David W. Tamkin
Ed Wong wrote, | I thought "pro" equipment ignored teh SCMS bits Pro equipment can ignore the SCMS bits of what it *reads*, but it needs to set them somehow or other on what it *writes*. My understanding ... and I've occasionally asked people who own a piece of pro equipment what it did ..

RE: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-12 Thread Nathan White
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of las Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 12:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MD: SCMS Strippers === = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when

Re: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-12 Thread las
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === As far as I know they are illegal in this count