Re: MD: Field Recording $10 mic

2001-10-01 Thread J. Coon
"J. Coon" wrote: > My stupid ISP decided it needed a new address. I will try to get it up > at a lycos or geocities site so it won't change. I'll be working on it > this week. Thanks to Eric, my $10 microphone site is back on line. http://www.minidisc.org/jim_coon/index.html ---

Re: MD: Field Recording

2001-10-01 Thread Mike Lastucka
PROTECTED] http://sites.netscape.net/element5/ 2048 bit DH 0x16DC15CD >From: Steve Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: MD: Field Recording >Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 07:49:16 -0600 > > >"J. Coon" wr

Re: MD: Field Recording

2001-10-01 Thread Steve Corey
"J. Coon" wrote: > > My stupid ISP decided it needed a new address. I will try to get it up > at a lycos or geocities site so it won't change. I'll be working on it > this week. I feel your pain. In the past 6 years, I've been through 6 ISPs! They keep getting bought, or sold, or just chang

Re: MD: Field Recording

2001-10-01 Thread J. Coon
My stupid ISP decided it needed a new address. I will try to get it up at a lycos or geocities site so it won't change. I'll be working on it this week. "Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor" wrote: > "J. Coon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I use this $10 stereo mike that I designed > >

Re: MD: Field Recording

2001-10-01 Thread Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor
"J. Coon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I use this $10 stereo mike that I designed > http://www.tir.com/~liteways/Mandolin.html#Microphone > with a SOny R30 recorder. Hi Jim, Your page seems to be missing. Any idea what's wrong? Rick ---

RE: MD: Field Recording (continued)

2001-09-21 Thread Payvand-G
Hi, What is the least expensive binaural mic that you sell? And do you make your own mics? It kinda sounds as though you do. - To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MD: Field Recording (continued)

2001-09-21 Thread Len Moskowitz
Alexandre Enkerli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those who wonder about what kind of field recording I do. > I (plan to) record public ceremonies of hunters' associations in Mali, > West Africa. Praise-songs performed at these ceremonies are the focus of > my research. You'll find that if you

RE: MD: Field Recording (continued)

2001-09-20 Thread fpga
>> Why not try the Vivanco EM216? It is small, cheap and near-professional >> quality. Its lower frequency point is given as 20Hz (but no -dB specified). >> The only drawback is that the stereo imaging is restricted because of its >> fixed small size. It will work directly with MD recorders that

Re: MD: Field Recording (continued)

2001-09-19 Thread J. Coon
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === These sounds were recorded with my $10 mike. h

RE: MD: Field Recording (continued)

2001-09-19 Thread Payvand-G
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === > Why not try the Vivanco EM216? It is small, c

Re: MD: Field Recording (continued)

2001-09-19 Thread fpga
>Now, the mic situation isn't completely solved. It seems a lot of people >are using ECM-MS907s. Looking at the specs and listening to recordings >made with similar mics, these don't offer good enough lower range >response (rated from 100Hz). It seems the 957s and 959s go down to 50Hz >which woul

Re: MD: Field Recording

2001-09-16 Thread J. Coon
I use this $10 stereo mike that I designed http://www.tir.com/~liteways/Mandolin.html#Microphone with a SOny R30 recorder. It works very well, and since there are no cords to mess with is pretty handy to use besides. The sound quality is great too. Alexandre Enkerli wrote: > > Thanks

Re: MD: Field Recording

2001-09-16 Thread Mike Lastucka
I don't do any kind of "field" recording, but I'm curious what you record in this fashion. :ml --- Mike Lastucka, B. Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sites.netscape.net/element5/ 2048 bit DH 0x16DC15CD >From: Alexandre Enkerli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTEC