Rodrigo Drupi Mansilla Jiménez wrote:
Reply to Jimenez:
Wow!! You really know your stuff about this!!! I just started reading about it
this morning, having only hear about the technology Sat. night.
So from what you say, although it would not be that simple to do, you could make
an HDCD MD.
> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 03:24:50 -0400
> From: las <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: MD: HDMD?
>
> If there is such a debate over the difference in quality between a CD
> and it's MD copy, why don't they use the same technology for Md that
> they use for the new HDCD?
I think you're talki
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
> Mike Burger wrote:
>
>> But isn't there some
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, las wrote:
> > How much data can the new HDCD hold?
>
> As far as I know the same as a regular CD.
But isn't there some compression involved there? If so, what's being
lost?
> > The only issue with sound quality regarding MDs is due to the vact that
> > ATRAC is a compr
> How much data can the new HDCD hold?
>
As far as I know the same as a regular CD.
> The only issue with sound quality regarding MDs is due to the vact that
> ATRAC is a compression algorithm, and you always lose something in
> compression.
>
Yes, but if you can improve the over all sound qua
--- las <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> If there is such a debate over the difference in quality between a
> CD
> and it's MD copy, why don't they use the same technology for Md
> that
> they use for the new HDCD?
Are you really talking about HDCD - the extension to the Red Book CD
format develo
How much data can the new HDCD hold?
The only issue with sound quality regarding MDs is due to the vact that
ATRAC is a compression algorithm, and you always lose something in
compression.
A CD holds 650MB worth of data, uncompressed. An MD...only 160MB. I
don't know what possible method a
