Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-04-02 Thread Nathan Russell
>From: Yvan Dutil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News >Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:45:22 +0100 > >Well, I think the diffence of culture between the people of GIMPS and those >of SETI@Home can be illustred simply by th

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-04-01 Thread Tzepish
<> We get what you're saying with the /very/ (emphasis on very), but it could have been more accurately expressed with: M(17) is about the number of people that could fit in three open arena stadiums. - Blaine Higdon _ Unsubscri

RE: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-04-01 Thread Rick Pali
Pierre About wrote: > > > M(17) is the number of people that could fit into a /very/ > > > large open arena or stadium. > > > > What stadium is that big? The one at Urbana seats only about 2. > > I think the one at U. of Texas Austin holds 60,000 Even one of the shorter tracks on the NASCAR

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-04-01 Thread kilfoyle
I think the one at U. of Texas Austin holds 60,000 Pierre About wrote: > >M(17) is the number of people that could fit into a /very/ large open arena > >or stadium. > > What stadium is that big? The one at Urbana seats only about 2. > > phma >

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-04-01 Thread Pierre Abbat
>M(17) is the number of people that could fit into a /very/ large open arena >or stadium. What stadium is that big? The one at Urbana seats only about 2. phma _ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm M

RE: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-31 Thread Aaron Blosser
>I do wonder whether /any/ people can really appreciate the size of numbers >with the magnitude of the Mersenne primes. Running down the list of known >ones: (? signifies that I'm not sure how to represent the number) I don't recall the details, but one nice example I heard to demonstrate large

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-31 Thread Nathan Russell
>From: Bryon Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News >Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:01:53 >1. To the average person, aliens are a lot "sexier" than prime numbers. >Anyone can picture little green men from Ma

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-31 Thread Brian J. Beesley
On 30 Mar 00, at 10:27, Stefan Struiker wrote: > I will be more detailed later, once I collect and refine my thoughts, but > at this point let me say that I think it is the group attracted to SETI, > and the Area 51, uh, "enthusiasts," who need some work, not the MPrime > interface. I tend to ag

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-31 Thread Yvan Dutil
Well, I think the diffence of culture between the people of GIMPS and those of SETI@Home can be illustred simply by the comparaison of subject of discussion between this list and sci.astro.seti. This is the listing of recent subjects: SETI@home Online Newsletter

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-31 Thread Bryon Buck
At 08:29 PM 03/30/2000 +1200, you wrote: >Is it that the search for prime numbers is perceived to be the domain of >geeks while everybody is supposed to be excited about extra-terrestrial >life? 1. To the average person, aliens are a lot "sexier" than prime numbers. Anyone can picture little gr

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Lucas Wiman
> Precisely. I hope a serious discussion, short of a "war," can be ignited, > although perhaps GIMPS is not the proper forum. George and > and the other pioneers and principals might weigh in on this. The "listening" > SETI group, not the astro-physicist community searching for Earth-like plan

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Nathan Russell
>From: "Frank_A_L_I_N_Y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Stefan Struiker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: "James Escamilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News >

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Stefan Struiker
  Nathan Russell wrote: all the ones I named were previous efforts) have found.  I hope this doesn't start /another/ onlist flamewar...  (sigh)   >I'm much more excited about gimps, and believe that I am much more >likely to find a certain Mersenne prime than evidence about >extra-terrestrial lif

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Stefan Struiker
Our machines are getting faster, wider, better. Itanium! Williamette! On to victory! And someone is going to find that double-time code breakthrough to get us all there at twice the speed. Where is Alan Turing when we really need him?! Stefanovic Frank_A_L_I_N_Y wrote: > what aobut the fact th

RE: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Aaron Blosser
>I hope this doesn't >start /another/ onlist flamewar... (sigh) I doubt that would happen on here...the people on this list are all a part of GIMPS, presumably. Well, except for the FBI and US WEST folks who monitor my posts. :) So I think it's safe to say that you're just preaching to the cho

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Frank_A_L_I_N_Y
MAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, March 30, 2000 1:48 PM Subject: Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News >TeamM: > >I will be more detailed later, once I collect and refine my thoughts, but at >this point let me say that I think it is the group attracted to SETI, and the >Area 51, uh,

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Jeff Woods
At 01:29 PM 3/30/00 -0500, you wrote: Is it that the search for prime numbers is perceived to be the domain of >>geeks while everybody is supposed to be excited about extra-terrestrial >>life? The possibility of LGM is "sexy" in a pop-culture kind of way. Prime numbers are only "sexy" to a ha

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Stefan Struiker
TeamM: I will be more detailed later, once I collect and refine my thoughts, but at this point let me say that I think it is the group attracted to SETI, and the Area 51, uh, "enthusiasts," who need some work, not the MPrime interface. More to come, Regards, Stefanovic Geoffrey Faivre-Malloy w

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Nathan Russell
>From: "Halliday, Ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Aaron Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: "Mersenne@Base. Com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News >Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 20:2

RE: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Geoffrey Faivre-Malloy
> The main reason I’ve heard for people liking the Seti project is > because the screen saver looks pretty. I've been thinking about this for about a month now and I really think it's time for Prime95 to get a facelift. Now, I was thinking just along the lines of having a better GUI. I.E. Have

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread James Escamilla
The main reason I’ve heard for people liking the Seti project is because the screen saver looks pretty. --- "Halliday, Ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This brings to mind a question I have been considering for a while: > Why > should it be that the seti@home project has collected such a large >

Re: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Halliday, Ian
This brings to mind a question I have been considering for a while: Why should it be that the seti@home project has collected such a large number of downloads while gimps has only around 10,000. Is it that the search for prime numbers is perceived to be the domain of geeks while everybody is suppo

RE: Mersenne: GIMPS in Science News

2000-03-30 Thread Aaron Blosser
>Sorry to be slow with this - I'm behind in my reading. > >GIMPS was mentioned favorably in an article in the 4 March 2000 issue of >"Science News" under the title "Great Computations." It includes >commentary on a variety of distributed computing projects, and in addition >to GIMPS it mentions G