Jeff wrote:
>No, and I do not know the whole story, and do hope
>I was wrong in my 'stingy' comment. But a cut was
>made, this much for the science - this much for grandma.
> Were I to stumble over a lunar, I think I'd place the cut
>differently - but that's a decision I'd have to be extremely
Doug wrote:
'is she stingy because she doesn't send
it to the "Chop Shop" for slicing and dicing to be distributed to careful
collectors as well as those who habitually break them into pieces and allow to
weather away in some corner, before it had been even classified?'
No, and I do not kn
En un mensaje con fecha 05/16/2005 10:50:39 AM Mexico Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribe:
>Doug escribe:
>>...how nice that this finder seems to be happy to share the
>>meteorite with scientists!
>Dude, it seems to me the finder does not give a rat's anorthite for the
science of me
Doug escribe:
...how nice that this finder seems to be happy to share the
meteorite with scientists!
Dude, it seems to me the finder does not give a rat's anorthite for the science
of meteoritics, or sharing for that matter, if all they could kick down for a
type specimen is 20 of their 13,50
On Sat, 14 May 2005 17:03:53 -0700, "Adam Hupe" wrote:
>That's ridiculous, Lunar material brought back from the moon would
baseline
>at more than $5,000.00 a gram. Anything less is not feasible because
the
>costs are tremendous and have already been calculated.
Adam
One should be very careful
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your most eloquent post. I see your point, but I also take the
liberty to disagree, at least for a part of it. In essence, you wrote:
> There is the little detail of haves and have nots and thousand-dollar
> a gram speculations. A have not cannot participate in that, lets not
Hola Norbert,
No need to ask for pardon Norbert, especially since in your heart you feel
you meant no offense. I never saw any offense = I saw a simple statement
which I agreed with in the first half (a lament not to be able to bond with
the
new Lunar), but I am in vigorous disagreement w
On Sat, 14 May 2005 17:03:53 -0700, "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That's ridiculous, Lunar material brought back from the moon would baseline
>at more than $5,000.00 a gram. Anything less is not feasible because the
>costs are tremendous and have already been calculated. Anybody who col
as we
could produce and we turned them down. I still believe lunaites are better
preserved in collections not jewelry.
Just my opinion,
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "Meteoryt.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteor
> What happens to the price of meteorites when we finally establish a base
on the moon and starting mining the asteroids?
>
> Steve
there will be a masssive SsssTeve Give Avay action :))
Or maybe You should try to return your samples to
Finmet/Polandmet/Farmet/Hupemet becouse they lost in 100
I dont want You to start be afraid my dear Lunar samples collectors, but
13.5kg of new Lunar is not Your last trouble :))
Read this one ! When I buy this samples I will put them all to ebay at 0.01$
and then will be true armageddon.
===
It`s me Göran Lindfors from Sweden, with the worlds m
On Sun, 15 May 2005 01:16:16 +0200, "Meteoryt.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nothing is forever, this include Lunar prices. When deserts will be empty,
>and no new lunars, Your DaG 400 will be worth again 25k, in next 20 years
>maybe :)))
Or maybe 20 years from now some aspiring country (but pr
> Happy you to have pay 1000 times over a piece of lunar
> meteorite and after this is go 800 times under the old
> pricewho have buy DaG 400 for $25,000/gr. and now
> the price is go to $1000/gr. is a total suicide.
>
> Matteo
noone is telling You "Matteo You MUST buy lunars".
Its Your busine
MexicoDoug wrote:
> Hola Norbert, I fail to see why you perceive a silver lining by
> preventing Lunar specimens to become accessible to the hands of amazed
> parent enthusiasts and collectors and the wonder of inspiring its
> wondrous effects with kids alike. What possible reason other than
On Sat, 14 May 2005 20:08:39 +0200 (CEST), M come Meteorite Meteorites <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Happy you to have pay 1000 times over a piece of lunar
>meteorite and after this is go 800 times under the old
>pricewho have buy DaG 400 for $25,000/gr. and now
>the price is go to $1000/gr. is
>
> Thank you for your open apology, I and the entire list appreciate it.
>
> Greg
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Greg Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 3:
Bill,
Thank you for your open apology, I and the entire list appreciate it.
Greg
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Re: 13.5 kg lunar
Greg,
Greg
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Greg Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 3:15 PM
> Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Re: 13.5 kg lunar
>
>
> > Greg,
> >
> > Are
Bill,
You are the kind of person that belongs to the new blogger site. You
contribute nothing but hard feelings and grief to the List. Be a man and
apologize to the List for your outrageous behavior or go to the other site
where you will be welcomed with open arms. If you have hard feelings abo
> Have a great weekend to all,
>
> Greg
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Walter Branch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 12:02 PM
> Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Re: 13.5 kg lunar
>
>
> >I agr
lter Branch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An:
> Betreff: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Re: 13.5 kg lunar
> Datum: Sat, 14 May 2005 12:02:03 -0400
>
> I agree. I would love to see a total collapse of the
> market, due to a sudden increase of finds, falls, or
> whatever. Ruin, ruin,
Maybe Matteo, you should invest in Star Wars action figures then...much
safer market.
- Original Message -
From: "M come Meteorite Meteorites" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Re: 13.5 kg lunar
Happy you
Happy you to have pay 1000 times over a piece of lunar
meteorite and after this is go 800 times under the old
pricewho have buy DaG 400 for $25,000/gr. and now
the price is go to $1000/gr. is a total suicide.
Matteo
--- "Meteoryt.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> >Norbert have all reason
So would I. Then everyone could afford to have a nice piece that didn't
require magnification to see it.
JKG
At 07:58 AM 5/14/2005, Darren Garrison wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:32:45 +0200 (CEST), M come Meteorite Meteorites
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Norbert have all reason...if a biggest l
Makes you wonder how he can afford to stay online or go to shows, the poor
sap. All his income gone the way of dinosaurs
- Original Message -
From: "Meteoryt.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Re: 13.5 kg
>Norbert have all reason...if a biggest lunar meteorite
>come in the market the market go in total ruin and the
>price of lunar meteorites go destroyed forever
You say that like it is a bad thing. I'd welcome it.
=
Matteo see everywhere only armageddon :))
-[ MARCIN CIMALA ]
lly futures now while they are low because they will go up
during the holiday season ;-)
Have a great weekend to all,
Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Walter Branch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Re: 13.5 kg
-
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Re: 13.5 kg lunar
On Sat, 14 May 2005 10:58:09 -0400, Darren Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matteo escribe:
market go in total ruin and the
price of lunar meteorites go destroyed forever
Matteo
Matteo,
My advice to you would be to avoid investing in lunaites, but instead
put your money into portalesites. (keep this quiet)
David
___
Matteo escribe:
>market go in total ruin and the
>price of lunar meteorites go destroyed forever
>Matteo
Hola Matteo,
If what you say is true, then the "moony market" has already factored this
in and we should be around half way there. Do you see evidence for this? Did
Zagami render su
On Sat, 14 May 2005 10:58:09 -0400, Darren Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:32:45 +0200 (CEST), M come Meteorite Meteorites <[EMAIL
>PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>Norbert have all reason...if a biggest lunar meteorite
>>come in the market the market go in total ruin and the
>
32 PM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Re: 13.5 kg lunar
> Norbert have all reason...if a biggest lunar meteorite
> come in the market the market go in total ruin and the
> price of lunar meteorites go destroyed forever
>
> Matteo
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> > N
On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:32:45 +0200 (CEST), M come Meteorite Meteorites <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Norbert have all reason...if a biggest lunar meteorite
>come in the market the market go in total ruin and the
>price of lunar meteorites go destroyed forever
You say that like it is a bad thing.
Norbert have all reason...if a biggest lunar meteorite
come in the market the market go in total ruin and the
price of lunar meteorites go destroyed forever
Matteo
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> Norbert C. escribe:
> Maybe there's a good part to that sad news, too, and
> that
> is that this
Norbert C. escribe:
Maybe there's a good part to that sad news, too, and that
is that this whopper probably won't ruin the lunar market
Hola Norbert, I fail to see why you perceive a silver lining by preventing
Lunar specimens to become accessible to the hands of amazed parent
enthusiasts a
Hi Jeff, Darren, and All,
Ceratinly a most interesting find, and great news. I've been aware of this
one since some months now, and all I can say that Darren's conclusions are
way to the spot. The absence of solar noble gases indicates a VERY short
transition time, and from what I've heard the res
Hi Darren and all,
Based on all the previous finds, The average lunar meteorite specimen
weighs 197.02 gm. (6 grams to 1425 grams, 3.1 lbs). So this doesn't fit
the usual, expected size. Looks like either a lower impacting body hit
the moon or another size impactor can liberate specimens from th
On Fri, 13 May 2005 19:14:24 -0400, "Jeff Pringle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>List -
>Did anyone notice in the provisional Met Bull 89 that someone found a 13.5
>KILO lunar in the Kalahari back in '99? Is that old news?
>
I certainly didn't know that such a large lunar had ever been found. Eve
38 matches
Mail list logo
