Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik DNS server can't resolve www.google.com

2009-12-03 Thread Vegard Svanberg
* Josh Luthman [2009-12-03 23:41]: > Here is my capture: > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/60247/mtdnsproblem.pcap Since there are only 10.x.x.x addresses in the dump, I suspect you did this on the internal interface. Try doing it on the external interface instead, to see if RouterOS does a query at all

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik DNS server can't resolve www.google.com

2009-12-03 Thread RickG
--- Albert Einstein > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20091203/fcba4491/attachment.html > > > ___ >

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik DNS server can't resolve www.google.com

2009-12-03 Thread Josh Luthman
hough. >>> SIGH...why only 24 hours in a day? >>> >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> &g

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik DNS server can't resolve www.google.com

2009-12-03 Thread Josh Luthman
>> >> > > ___ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > -

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik DNS server can't resolve www.google.com

2009-12-03 Thread ccrum
I used to have a boss tell me "There's 24 hours a dayand then there is the night." He was a slave driver. Cameron Butch Evans wrote: On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:47 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote: This has happened three times in the last two days. Started with 4.0 and the problem exists on 4.

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik DNS server can't resolve www.google.com

2009-12-03 Thread Vegard Svanberg
* Josh Luthman [2009-12-03 17:24]: > The thing that confuses me is my Windows 7 box has worked for 2 or 3 > months. The XP machine worked for closer to 2 years. The problem started > yesterday morning. Could this be related to packet size? I've seen reports elsewhere about RouterOS DNS cache n

Re: [Mikrotik] Content Filtering

2009-12-03 Thread Josh Luthman
> > VP > > > > 903-589-0044 Office > > > > 903-625-0741 Mobile > > > > 903-541-0889 Fax > > > > www.ckswireless.com > > > > > > > > -- next part -- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >

Re: [Mikrotik] Content Filtering

2009-12-03 Thread Doug Clark
Fax www.ckswireless.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.butchevans com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20091203/ad030e88/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not ava

Re: [Mikrotik] [SPAM] - Re: WDS - Found word(s) list error in the Text body

2009-12-03 Thread Jon Paul Kelley
My understanding is one end is set to bridge and the other end is set to station. Jon Paul Kelley VP 903-589-0044 Office 903-625-0741 Mobile 903-541-0889 Fax www.ckswireless.com -Original Message- From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] O

Re: [Mikrotik] Content Filtering

2009-12-03 Thread Jon Paul Kelley
ckswireless.com > > > > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20091203/ad030e88/a ttachment.html > > > -- next part -- > A non-text

Re: [Mikrotik] [SPAM] - Re: [SPAM] - Re: WDS - Found word(s) list error in theText body - Found word(s) list error in the subject

2009-12-03 Thread Damian Wallace
in 802.11. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To not obfuscate the MAC addresses behind a >>>>>>>>

Re: [Mikrotik] [SPAM] - Re: [SPAM] - Re: WDS - Found word(s) list error in the Text body - Found word(s) list error in the subject

2009-12-03 Thread Damian Wallace
l >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>

Re: [Mikrotik] [SPAM] - Re: WDS - Found word(s) list error in the Text body

2009-12-03 Thread Chris Gotstein
So do you set each end to Bridge? Or is one end a Station WDS? Bill Prince wrote: It's not well documented. But when you set the type to "bridge" instead of "ap bridge", it becomes a PTP link. The simple bridge type only allows one client. Which brings up something that I was wondering ab

Re: [Mikrotik] [SPAM] - Re: WDS - Found word(s) list error in the Text body

2009-12-03 Thread Josh Luthman
t;>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's SOP in 802.11. >>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Mikrotik] Content Filtering

2009-12-03 Thread Josh Luthman
; > > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20091203/ad030e88/attachment.html > > > -- next part -- > A non-text attachment was

Re: [Mikrotik] [SPAM] - Re: WDS - Found word(s) list error in the Text body

2009-12-03 Thread Bill Prince
It's not well documented. But when you set the type to "bridge" instead of "ap bridge", it becomes a PTP link. The simple bridge type only allows one client. Which brings up something that I was wondering about. If you set up a MT with, say 3 or 4 virtual APs all set for "bridge", with dif

[Mikrotik] Content Filtering

2009-12-03 Thread Jon Paul Kelley
-0741 Mobile 903-541-0889 Fax www.ckswireless.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20091203/ad030e88/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachme

Re: [Mikrotik] [SPAM] - Re: WDS - Found word(s) list error in the Text body

2009-12-03 Thread Randy Cosby
ist Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermai

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik DNS server can't resolve www.google.com

2009-12-03 Thread Josh Luthman
s.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/2009120

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik DNS server can't resolve www.google.com

2009-12-03 Thread Butch Evans
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:47 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote: > This has happened three times in the last two days. Started with 4.0 and > the problem exists on 4.3. > > On Windows 7 and Windows XP I can't resolve the CNAME www.google.com - > however, if I dig www.google.com @mikrotik I get a correct a

[Mikrotik] Mikrotik DNS server can't resolve www.google.com

2009-12-03 Thread Josh Luthman
OH 45373 "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." --- Albert Einstein -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20091

Re: [Mikrotik] WDS

2009-12-03 Thread Martín @ Ibersystems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all through the day. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&

Re: [Mikrotik] Strange DUDE problem

2009-12-03 Thread Dennis Burgess
The issue is you cannot bridge a wireless station. So Tranzeo and those units do MAC NAT and another such trickery. Normally with one IP behind it, its not a big deal. But if you have many, that's where you can get that wrong. You would have to have something behind that MAC NAT to be affective

[Mikrotik] Training questions

2009-12-03 Thread Butch Evans
Many of you know me, but some do not. I have been training people how to use Mikrotik's RouterOS since before Mikrotik had it's first training class (at least in the US) back in 2004. In those early days, we could not hold enough classes to satisfy the needs of the user base. We were turning people