Lab question:
Not super important, but trying to figure something out.
I'm trying to route a C-class to my home lab. So being dynamic at my house, I
set up a tunnel using L2TP and then using PPTP.
After failing on LT2P, I'm following the instructions at:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:BCP
Not sure what you have.
In all versions we have run OSPF on I have seen when, after making OSPF
changes, a router get routes it only gets 10-20 and then sits there.
Normally I can get it to get the full table by doing the following in a
terminal window
rout ospf ins
dis 0; en 0
The disable an
Yes, full state, nothing of note in the logs...
-=Wayne Hancock =-
SandRidge Energy, Inc.
123 Robert S. Kerr Ave
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
405-429-6195
whanc...@sandridgeenergy.com
-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
[mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 10:54:31AM -0700, Grand Avenue Broadband wrote:
> Now you guys have me worried. Our entire network is on 6.10. Is
> there any particular reason none of you are using that one?
>
If you are not having problems, don't worry about it. There were a few
bugs, mostly PPP relat
Now you guys have me worried. Our entire network is on 6.10. Is there any
particular reason none of you are using that one?
On May 8, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
> Was everything showing Full as the State?
> Were there errors in the log?
>
> We have a mix of 5.26, 6.9 and 6.11 with n
Was everything showing Full as the State?
Were there errors in the log?
We have a mix of 5.26, 6.9 and 6.11 with no issues.
On 5/8/2014 12:11 PM, Wayne Hancock wrote:
In my use case, I have ~ 130 routers connecting on a /24 Network/VLAN (Canopy
solution). Seems odd that I'd have no issues wit
In my use case, I have ~ 130 routers connecting on a /24 Network/VLAN (Canopy
solution). Seems odd that I'd have no issues with the 6.9 code but do with the
6.11... Even odder is that it isn't just the 6.11's that have the issue, if I
have ANY 6.11's on the segment joining OSPF I can get this b
I have several routers running 6.11 and OSPF and have seen no such issues.
Jon Paul Kelley
CKS Wireless
-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
[mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Wayne Hancock
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 8:23 AM
To: Mikrotik
I've got a mostly 5.21 network, but some of the new links I have put up I
either have 6.11 or 6.12 installed and I can't say that they have given me
much trouble at all. One thing I have found with OSPF is to keep the
subjects as small as possible. On point to points I use a /30 and at tower
sites
Did anyone else encounter weird issues with 6.11 and OSPF? I had sites that
were showing neighbor adjacency, but were receiving no routes...
On 6.9 I don't have the issue.
-=Wayne Hancock =-
SandRidge Energy, Inc.
123 Robert S. Kerr Ave
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
405-429-6195
whanc...@sandridgee
com
> >> http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
> >>
> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
> >> RouterOS
> >>
> >-- next part --
> >An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >URL:
tik
>> RouterOS
>>
>-- next part --
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
><http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20140508/fab2cbcd/attachment.html>
>___
; RouterOS
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20140508/fab2cbcd/attachment.html>
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://
Why would torch show a higher tx rate to an ip address port 80 than was
configured for a much lower rate via simple queues? Even their antenna doesn't
show the much higher tx rate that torch does.
Sent via the WebMail system at
14 matches
Mail list logo
