I'm seeing an issue with our VRRP interfaces and am hoping someone can
offer help.
I run VRRP on 2 border routers with separate internet providers. Let's
call them A and B. Internally, they are connected via a bridged
network.
Router A is primary and most of my public IP space flows through
James,
> How does the upstream know which router to send the return traffic to?
Both routers mark the BGP Next-Hop as the VRRP address. The upstream router
sends all downstream packets to the next-hop address which is received by the
router which is the current VRRP master.
--
Blake Covarrubi
discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] VRRP
On Apr 28, 2011, at 5:34 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Don't mean to Hijack, but is it possible to do VRRP with a single BGP
> session to an upstream?
>
> Or should a separate BGP session run 24/7 from both VRRP routers t
On Apr 28, 2011, at 5:34 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Don't mean to Hijack, but is it possible to do VRRP with a single BGP
> session to an upstream?
>
> Or should a separate BGP session run 24/7 from both VRRP routers to the
> upstream? Ie 2x different BGP sessions
Two different BG
s.com
[mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: 28 April 2011 10:30 PM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] VRRP
I looked at the traffic, pps. You could write a script, maybe. I didn't
get that much into it myself - I was looking to get one good router th
I looked at the traffic, pps. You could write a script, maybe. I didn't
get that much into it myself - I was looking to get one good router then two
PCs I wouldn't trust my mp3 collection on.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu,
Ok, with all this said, when you get it setup, I assume in the lab.
How will you know which router is active? Can they notify you some
how?
Casey
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Jacob Heider wrote:
> Ok, I reread the VRRP and VRRP-examples pages again, and I don't think I'm
> there yet. VRRP
Ok, I reread the VRRP and VRRP-examples pages again, and I don't think
I'm there yet. VRRP runs on an interface. Let's try this with examples:
Router1:
ether1-wan: 7.7.7.5/30
ether2-vrrp: 192.168.1.253/24
vrrp1: 192.168.1.1/24
route: 0.0.0.0/0 -> 7.7.7.4 int = ?
Router2:
ether1-wan: 7.7.7.5/30
I see. So, thinking back, the VRRP creates a kind of virtual router,
which will be the gateway for the LAN (ideally), and which both physical
routers will use for their transport out, and the public IP info will go
on the virtual router, rather than on either physical router?
On 2011-04-28 3:1
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:24 -0400, Jacob Heider wrote:
> So, the backup is only accessible at its internal, real IP while in
> backup-mode? So, it wouldn't, for example, have internet access for
> itself?
Yes and no. With VRRP, there are 2 "parts" to the configuration. These
routers have to h
As to those details it's way too far back and I did so little work with VRRP
I am not certain. Maybe a port between the routers for WAN connectivity
through the primary router.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at
So, the backup is only accessible at its internal, real IP while in
backup-mode? So, it wouldn't, for example, have internet access for
itself? Maybe I just need to set this up and take a look, but what would
the box do if you tried to do a /tool fetch
url="http://download.mikrotik.com/routeros
You'd set the public IP on both. Only the primary would answer ARP
requests. Once the secondary box no longer hears the heartbeat of the
primary box, it picks up. There was a MT bug with VRRP ages ago. I do mean
ages - probably 2.8 but maybe 2.9. At least v3 I would expect you'd be all
right,
Josh,
How does that work with respect to the WAN interface. As I understand
you'd have:
Internet
|
v
WAN Device (modem, etc)
|
v
switched device
||
vv
VRRP MasterVRRP Backup
||
vv
LAN
Two routers, same config. Heartbeat determines who takes over (I think by
taking over the are requests).
On Apr 26, 2011 5:29 PM, "Dylan Bouterse" wrote:
> Have a design question. Never implemented VRRP before, but very curious
about it's practical application. Based on the Wiki, I think I unders
Have a design question. Never implemented VRRP before, but very curious about
it's practical application. Based on the Wiki, I think I understand how the LAN
side works, seems pretty strait forward, but how does the WAN side work? I'm
assuming single Internet connection connected to a switch wit
Hi,
We have a dual processor x86 and an RB600 running VRRP together on 3.27.
There was a tx hang on the x86's ethernet interface, and VRRP did it's
job.
-Kristian
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:36 +0200, james wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
>
>
> I am going to setup VRRP between two X86 machines running ROS V
There was a bug in 2.8 or early 2.9 for VRRP. Definitely worked in later
2.9 for a few weeks/months. I quit using VRRP before 3.x even released.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:36 AM, james wrote:
> Hi
Hi Guys
I am going to setup VRRP between two X86 machines running ROS V4.13 (
Already installed and live)
I cannot afford to implement VRRP and then the whole setup crashed because
of an issue with the X86 platform. So I does anybody know if there are any
known issues with VRRP on X86 based
] Mikrotik VRRP
I've been testing out VRRP and it seems to work pretty well if you want
to fail over from one machine to another on a single interface. But
what I would really like to be able to do is duplicate my MT routers
against equipment failure rather than network failure.
Example:
I've been testing out VRRP and it seems to work pretty well if you want
to fail over from one machine to another on a single interface. But
what I would really like to be able to do is duplicate my MT routers
against equipment failure rather than network failure.
Example:
CPE AP ---+---
21 matches
Mail list logo
