I guess you should take a look at Systrace:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systrace
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:28 AM, wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> I was wondering if you could give me some input about the following
> security
> matter. It seems to me that using a web-browser, an email client, and
> a cha
Hi misc,
I was wondering if you could give me some input about the following security
matter. It seems to me that using a web-browser, an email client, and
a chat client (if permitted at all) are the
un-safest forms of interaction of a typical desktop user with his/hers
computer. Apart of stand
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:52:14 -0400
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Sebastian Rother wrote:
> > Is it possible to disable for example ehci at runtime?
> > As far as I understand I can use config -e -f /bsd to modify the BSD kernel
> > but the changes just get applied after a reboot.
> >
> > Is there any
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:56:48 -0400
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Sebastian Rother wrote:
> > Is it possible to disable for example ehci at runtime?
> > As far as I understand I can use config -e -f /bsd to modify the BSD kernel
> > but the changes just get applied after a reboot.
>
> And I forgot that
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:55:38 +0300
Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> On 26 March 2009 P3. 02:11:16 Sebastian Rother wrote:
> > Is it possible to disable for example ehci at runtime?
> > As far as I understand I can use config -e -f /bsd to modify the BSD
> > kernel but the changes just get applied after a re
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:11:16AM +0100, Sebastian Rother wrote:
> Is it possible to disable for example ehci at runtime?
> As far as I understand I can use config -e -f /bsd to modify the BSD kernel
> but the changes just get applied after a reboot.
>
> Is there any method to may disable a speci
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:36:59 -0400 "Aaron W. Hsu"
wrote:
> > good, you've actually got two cards in the machine. A number of
> > dual/multi head cards can be run "Zaphod Mode" (i.e. two or more
> > "Device" sections for a single card), but the new intel(4) driver
> > does not support this.
>
> A
Ok..Here's an update on the progress.
1. I installed MTR on my OBSD machine
2. Located the MTR file on the system located at /usr/local/sbin
3. within that directory I ran: # ldd mtr
Which gave the following output:
StartEnd Type Open Ref GrpRef Name
1c00 3c1b3000 exe 10 0
Sebastian Rother wrote:
Is it possible to disable for example ehci at runtime?
As far as I understand I can use config -e -f /bsd to modify the BSD kernel
but the changes just get applied after a reboot.
And I forgot that point here too, sorry, my bad. Yes you would need to
reboot to get the e
Sebastian Rother wrote:
Is it possible to disable for example ehci at runtime?
As far as I understand I can use config -e -f /bsd to modify the BSD kernel
but the changes just get applied after a reboot.
Is there any method to may disable a specific driver only at runtime?
Lets say like ehci?
Yes please. I'd love to take a look at the code.
Thanks,
Vivek
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Paul Irofti wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:34:37PM -0700, Vivek Ayer wrote:
>> I guess what this will come down to is whether I can install MPICH2 on
>> OpenBSD/sparc64. Alan Watson has a howto f
> the key is not to have coffee (or anything that is claimed to be
> coffee) in mouth when reading these ridiculous statements
>
Not going to argue with that of course, correctness is what matters here not
friendliness. And someone who runs an ISP definitely knows better than a
newbie.
Trying to
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:16:00 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Barowy
wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> >
> > Any chance you know the brand name of the upgraded processor?
> >
>
> It's a FastMac. 1.2 GHz G4. I _think_ the model # is APP-5582.
> FastMac seems to have removed most of the info
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:34:37PM -0700, Vivek Ayer wrote:
> I guess what this will come down to is whether I can install MPICH2 on
> OpenBSD/sparc64. Alan Watson has a howto for OpenBSD/i386 at
> http://www.crya.unam.mx/~alan/openbsd-mpich2.html.en
I had a working port of that at some point. But
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:12:52AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> the key is not to have coffee (or anything that is claimed to be
> coffee) in mouth when reading these ridiculous statements
Black "coffee" is not too bad, but Coca Cola Classic makes a really
sticky mess in your laptop.
Tip: if yo
* Luis F Urrea [2009-03-24 16:41]:
> 2009/3/24 Henning Brauer :
> > > fortunately denmark has (basically) no coffee, otherwise i would have
> > > needed a new x40 keyboard. good laugh.
> > >
> > > what next, I wear no underwear for security reasons?
> >
> > Shit, I drink like 4 cups of coffee a da
On 26 March 2009 c. 02:11:16 Sebastian Rother wrote:
> Is it possible to disable for example ehci at runtime?
> As far as I understand I can use config -e -f /bsd to modify the BSD
> kernel but the changes just get applied after a reboot.
>
> Is there any method to may disable a specific driver onl
Is it possible to disable for example ehci at runtime?
As far as I understand I can use config -e -f /bsd to modify the BSD kernel
but the changes just get applied after a reboot.
Is there any method to may disable a specific driver only at runtime?
Lets say like ehci?
Kind regards,
Sebastian
I am having issues with an OpenBSD vlan interface seeing traffic on a
trunk interface.
I've got an OpenBSD 4.4 system running on a Dell PoowerEdge 2950 with
2x Neterion Xframe E SR interface cards. These are connected to a
Cisco 6509E with WS-X6704-10GE line cards over multimode fiber. The
logic
You are invited to "CONTACT FEDEX COURIER SERVICE".
By your host Jeff Anil:
Date: Wednesday March 25, 2009
Time: 8:00 pm - 9:00 pm (GMT +00:00)
Location: Attn;It has been long we communicated last, am so sorry
for the delay ,I mean your cheque
I guess what this will come down to is whether I can install MPICH2 on
OpenBSD/sparc64. Alan Watson has a howto for OpenBSD/i386 at
http://www.crya.unam.mx/~alan/openbsd-mpich2.html.en
Vivek
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Vivek Ayer wrote:
> Thanks Gerhard...I'll definitely look at MPI, Global
Is there a way to filter ARP on an OpenBSD bridge firewall joining a
bunch of ethernet ports with their own VLANs? I'm horrified by the
shared ethernet segments some organizations use for access among
mutually un-trusting people.
Currently pf does allow me to prevent L3 games, but it seems like
it
> i am sure it's more than easy to go through the papers
> and show where my money went and see who is right.
>
> that is all i am asking. more transparency in this open project.
Oh are you talking about donation money now? That's a different
thing. The main contention is about proceeds from t
Can anyone help me please.
When I connect via vpn I got an ip 172.16.0.2 and I set it as default route.
I am able to ping 172.16.0.1 ( tun0 in openBSD).
When I ping 10.100/16 ip I am able to reach it:
# tcpdump -i vic3 'dst host 10.100.0.1'
tcpdump: listening on vic3, link-type EN10MB
09:28:56.8
J.C.,
Thanks a bunch for this really informative response...
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:00:24 -0400 (EDT) "Aaron W. Hsu"
> wrote:
>
> > Section "Module"
> > Load "dbe"
> > Load "dri"
> > Load "extmod"
> > Load "glx"
> > Load "freetype"
> > EndSection
>
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:05:09AM -0700, Brian Keefer said that
> On Mar 25, 2009, at 9:41 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
>>
>> of course its true downside (just like greyfiltering's) is that it
>> needs a considerable amount of babysitting. but it's worth it for me.
>
> So basically, it's not r
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Dave Wilson wrote:
frantisek holop wrote:
that is all i am asking. more transparency in this open project.
Whilst transparency is a good thing, and the project is known for its
Oh, gawd, please, everyone, stop with the "transparency" garbage. It's
so over used right
On Mar 25, 2009, at 9:41 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
of course its true downside (just like greyfiltering's) is that it
needs a considerable amount of babysitting. but it's worth it for me.
So basically, it's not reliable and any "work saved" from the MTA is
doubled by humans. You're failin
I know both Floor and Wim personally, and have done thousands of
dollars of business with KD85.
I trust both men, and have never known either to act rashly. Until
Mr. Vandeputte responds, I suggest refraining from speculation.
On 3/25/09, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 05:03:31PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:40:13AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
>
> > Don't you think theo has the best interest of the project as his first
> > priority?
>
> best interest: yes.
So why do you think he would bring such a
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:27:03AM -0700, Brian Keefer said that
> The amount of connections rejected by those settings will be pretty
> small as a percentage, and it's not even close to "reliable sign of
i forgot to add: YMMV.
those postfix settings have for the current week rejected 690
frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:41:04AM +0100, Floor Terra said that
Why doesn''t Wim explain the situation here. Less work isn't it. ;)
I don't know. And I don't want to get involved.
I'm concerned about Theo, Wim, the project and anybody else who is
involved a
frantisek holop wrote:
>
> that is all i am asking. more transparency in this open project.
Whilst transparency is a good thing, and the project is known for its
open stance, surely in this particular case it would be imprudent for us
to comment further until the parties directly involved have r
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:20:10PM +, Matthew Szudzik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:10:39AM -0700, Vivek Ayer wrote:
> > experiment. The Sun blade systems are all already web servers which
> > have allocated 2 GB to memcached, but still have so much more to give.
> > I thought maybe this
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:10:39AM -0700, Vivek Ayer wrote:
> experiment. The Sun blade systems are all already web servers which
> have allocated 2 GB to memcached, but still have so much more to give.
> I thought maybe this was a useful way to use that extra RAM.
Another problem that you might e
Hi all,
Thanks for the suggestions. I realize it'll probably be too slow to
utilize the memory. The Sun Blade Systems are on a gigabit network
with an Dell XPS 733 MHz (everything is gigabit) which has the MATLAB
and Mathematica licenses. We are currently running Octave and Maxima
on our Sparc64 m
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:40:13AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
> Don't you think theo has the best interest of the project as his first
> priority?
best interest: yes.
best attitude and people skills: i am not so sure...
all i am saying is that the other side still hasn't spoken up.
i
> I've read this a few minutes ago. I'm not a developer, nor a security
> specialist so I was wondering if that is a serious issue for Openbsd.
> http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/core_bios.pdf
> As far as I understood, they mention the "Openbsd shadow files" as being
> vulnerable/exploitable to these kin
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:51 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
>>
>> Theo has made some serious allegations and i hope he has evidence
>> to back it up.
>
> Theo may be many things,... but a liar I have never found him to be.
>
Please, statements l
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:16:53AM -0300, Jose Fragoso said that
> If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
> domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
> hostname) or could it use a different HELO command when sending
> mail from different do
Why would you doubt what was said?
Don't you think theo has the best interest of the project as his first
priority?
This note is extremely uncalled for.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:51:59PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:41:04AM +0100, Floor Terra said that
> > > W
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:51 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> Theo has made some serious allegations and i hope he has evidence
> to back it up.
>
Theo may be many things,... but a liar I have never found him to be.
On Mar 25, 2009, at 8:14 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:40:09PM +0100, Gilles Chehade said
that
Are you sure ?
just because you demonstrated a smtp session with
a questionably set up mail server it doesn't mean
you are right. sendmail by default does not check he
Hi,
I have this enviroment:
Server A ( OpenBSD 4.4 ), with poptop and PF and windows clients
connecting via pptp client.
Problem: vpn clients cannot access network 10.10.0.0/24 but they are
able to access 10.100.0.0/24.
The rules are the same, just this is different:
# route show
Rou
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:40:09PM +0100, Gilles Chehade said that
> Are you sure ?
just because you demonstrated a smtp session with
a questionably set up mail server it doesn't mean
you are right. sendmail by default does not check helo.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_helo_required = yes
s
Salve questo messaggio per informarti della nascita della nuova comunit`
ESCORT piy Glamour d'Italia.
www.RossoEscort.com
Un' importate azienda straniera ha acquistato i diritti di un noto
portale italiano di annunci escort trasformandolo nei servizi e anche nei
contenuti.
Sei un escort?
Vieni su
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:41:04AM +0100, Floor Terra said that
> > Why doesn''t Wim explain the situation here. Less work isn't it. ;)
>
> I don't know. And I don't want to get involved.
> I'm concerned about Theo, Wim, the project and anybody else who is
> involved and don't want to make th
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> The RFC specifically states what to do if you do not have proper
> reverse mapping records (4.1.1.1 of rfc2821). It may not be best
> practice today, but your remark is utter BS.
>
Partially true, .. an EHLO may be used for further validation, but that
w
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:22:30AM -0500, L. V. Lammert said that
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jose Fragoso wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
> > domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
> > hostname) or could it u
L. V. Lammert a icrit :
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jose Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
hostname) or could it use a different HELO command when sending
mail from different dom
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:22:30AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
| On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jose Fragoso wrote:
|
| > Hi,
| >
| > If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
| > domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
| > hostname) or could it use a dif
Hi,
Works fine on amd64, with two NTFS partition on the same disk of my
OpenBSD :
i:20739915176715NTFS
j:2859570049512330NTFS
And yes "cp -r" some dir seems a little quicker than before.
Cheers,
Jonathan Armani
Owain Ainsworth a icrit :
Hi,
Could
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jose Fragoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
> domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
> hostname) or could it use a different HELO command when sending
> mail from different domains?
>
> Thanks fo
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Any chance you know the brand name of the upgraded processor?
It's a FastMac. 1.2 GHz G4. I _think_ the model # is APP-5582. FastMac
seems to have removed most of the information for this upgrade from their
website.
As for the missing serial (t
Sorry, I want CC the list, but forgot it. I send this mail to Theo de
Raadt:
- Forwarded message from Rene Maroufi -
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:09:49 +0100
From: Rene Maroufi
To: Theo de Raadt
Subject: Re: European orders
In-Reply-To: <200903242337.n2onbghn015...@cvs.openbsd.org>
User-A
Hi,
If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
hostname) or could it use a different HELO command when sending
mail from different domains?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Jose.
--
Be Yourself @ mail.com
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:30:56AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> As for the actual question of getting Mathematica and/or Matlab to run
> on your sparc64 under OpenBSD, what about using SysV-R4 emulation with
> the available Solaris binaries?
>
> At least with Mathematica, linux binaries are only a
Henning Brauer wrote:
* jmc [2009-03-11 15:05]:
so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
if anybody is actually using it, I'd like to hear about it.
I'm a little late to this one, but I've been using it for testing VPN
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:09:08 -0700 Vivek Ayer
wrote:
Hi guys,
I realize openbsd/sparc64 is probably the best port of any OS to the
sparc64 architecture, however I work in an environment where
matlab/mathematica are greatly needed. I know openbsd/i386 has linux
binary emulation, which would do
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:09:08 -0700 Vivek Ayer
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I realize openbsd/sparc64 is probably the best port of any OS to the
> sparc64 architecture, however I work in an environment where
> matlab/mathematica are greatly needed. I know openbsd/i386 has linux
> binary emulation, which
Hi guys,
I realize openbsd/sparc64 is probably the best port of any OS to the
sparc64 architecture, however I work in an environment where
matlab/mathematica are greatly needed. I know openbsd/i386 has linux
binary emulation, which would do the trick, but I want to use these 2
awesome Sun blade ma
Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> i guess this also means that you dont know about
>> a replacement company that would take up the gauntlet..
>
> Maybe one will show up. Vacuums tend to do that.
>
>> how much is shipping from canada/us to europe?
>
> Certainly more.
>
>> i guess in big cities where ther
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:11:41AM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hello,
> I've read this a few minutes ago. I'm not a developer, nor a security
> specialist so I was wondering if that is a serious issue for Openbsd.
> http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/core_bios.pdf
> As far as I understood, they mention th
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:52:04PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> From a commit message an hour or so ago:
>
> Disable future European orders since the distributor is way too far behind
> in reconciling payments to the project for past sales, and years of trying
> to resolve it have made very littl
Hello,
I've read this a few minutes ago. I'm not a developer, nor a security
specialist so I was wondering if that is a serious issue for Openbsd.
http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/core_bios.pdf
As far as I understood, they mention the "Openbsd shadow files" as being
vulnerable/exploitable to these kind o
A public statement from him (Wim) would be appropriate now I believe.
Especially informing all of us who have pre-ordered the latest release
via him what will happen with our orders, and importantly when he will
forward the proceeds to Theo et al.
/Pete
On 25 Mar 2009, at 01:16, Floor Te
66 matches
Mail list logo
