On May 17, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
I think you've found the dumbest and tiniest here. I'd suggest
looking anywhere else. There's probably something in your database
config that could be tweaked to make more difference than this.
i'm pretty sure I have too.
database has been
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 00:13, Tyler Bird wrote:
I am setting up a new server with mod_perl + apache 2.0 + some legacy code
and am sporadically rececing a segmentation fault to my apache logs like
so.
Maybe this helps:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/devel/debug
On 5/17/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm refactoring a certain bottleneck, and looking for the dumbest
tiniest improvements I can make in this one package.
I think you've found the dumbest and tiniest here. I'd suggest
looking anywhere else. There's probably something in yo
On May 17, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Michael Peters wrote:
I would imagine the 2nd to be marginally faster. Perl doesn't have to
re-allocate memory for the array each time the sub is called, but
it does have
to re-initialize it. As long as the array's contents are constant
I'd go with
the 2nd exam
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
>
> I apologize for the stupidity of this in advance-- its just something
> that I thought of in relation to mod_perl after starting a discussion on
> perlmonks about use constant vs sub(){} ...
>
>
> does anyone know if there is a memory/other difference under mod_perl f
On 5/17/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does anyone know if there is a memory/other difference under mod_perl
for
sub a {
my @items= qw| 1 2 3 |;
foreach my $a ( @items ) {}
}
vs
my @_b_items= qw| 1 2 3 |;
I apologize for the stupidity of this in advance-- its just something
that I thought of in relation to mod_perl after starting a discussion
on perlmonks about use constant vs sub(){} ...
does anyone know if there is a memory/other difference under mod_perl
for
sub a {
On Thursday 17 May 2007 00:13, Tyler Bird wrote:
> I am setting up a new server with mod_perl + apache 2.0 + some legacy code
> and am sporadically rececing a segmentation fault to my apache logs like
> so.
Maybe this helps:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/devel/debug/c.html
Is your code by chanc
