Hi.
Never mind all the stuff below (although it may end up helping another compiler-dummy like
me). I now got the reason : on my laptop (and also on the other Windows machine) the
version of Strawberry Perl was 5.18.4.1 32-bit, but it was /not/ the "no-64-bit-ints"
specific version found here
Your perl -V output shows:
archname=MSWin32-x86-multi-thread-64int
which means you have the 64-bit-int version of Strawberry Perl.
My builds are (out of necessity) for the normal 32-bit-int versions,
named "no64" -- as suggested by the names of my zip files, and as I
clearly stated in the announ
On 17 February 2015 at 13:27, Michael Lackhoff wrote:
> Am 17.02.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Steve Hay:
>
>> You can't. The VC9 build of the mod_perl components are not compatible
>> with StrawberryPerl, which is built with gcc and therefore uses a
>> different CRT (msvcrt.dll vs msvcr90.dll).
>>
>> The
Am 17.02.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Steve Hay:
You can't. The VC9 build of the mod_perl components are not compatible
with StrawberryPerl, which is built with gcc and therefore uses a
different CRT (msvcrt.dll vs msvcr90.dll).
The 32-bit components that I've built before were built with VC6 in
order
On 17 February 2015 at 09:40, Michael Lackhoff wrote:
> Am 15.02.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Steve Hay:
>
If you want 32-bit then the easiest way is to build it yourself using
a perl that you built yourself with the same compiler.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a recommended compiler? I use Strawberry p
Am 15.02.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Steve Hay:
If you want 32-bit then the easiest way is to build it yourself using
a perl that you built yourself with the same compiler.
Is there a recommended compiler? I use Strawberry perl, do you know
which compiler is used for that perl? As you say, it would
Steve Hay wrote:
...
Unfortunately you'll need to use VC++ for now because mod_perl doesn't
currently support gcc/dmake (which is what both StrawberryPerl and
ActivePerl now use). I hope to fix that soon, though...
I'll be eternally grateful too, when you get to that point.
I am also despera
On 15 Feb 2015 16:37, "Michael Lackhoff" wrote:
>
> Am 15.02.2015 um 17:15 schrieb Steve Hay:
>
> > I will put some new ones up at http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/
> > soon, by they'll be 64-bit only for now.
>
> Thanks! Though it might be difficult to get everything else I need in
> 64bit, too
Am 15.02.2015 um 17:15 schrieb Steve Hay:
> I will put some new ones up at http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/
> soon, by they'll be 64-bit only for now.
Thanks! Though it might be difficult to get everything else I need in
64bit, too.
> If you want 32-bit then the easiest way is to build it you
On 15 February 2015 at 15:57, Michael Lackhoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some/great problems installing a specific module under 5.16. The
> whole application which has this module as a dependency runs under mod_perl.
> The module installs (almost) fine under 5.20 but I could not find
> mod_perl wind
Hi,
I have some/great problems installing a specific module under 5.16. The
whole application which has this module as a dependency runs under mod_perl.
The module installs (almost) fine under 5.20 but I could not find
mod_perl windows binaries for 5.20 yet.
Any idea where I can get mod_perl for
11 matches
Mail list logo
