On Nov 8, 2007, at 1:40 PM, John ORourke wrote:
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight,
easy to
I can disagree -- nginx does everything that pound does, plus
will handle your vanilla
FLAME WAR!!!1!1!
well its not meant to flame... your options are this:
a)
From: "John ORourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seriously though, it looks as though there are 5-10 good front end server
options which support the following to various degrees:
- reverse proxy
- caching
- load balancing
- static file serving
There is no clear choice since our setups range from singl
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
At the address
http://www.guindilla.eu/blog/2006/12/31/deployement-nginx-reverse-proxy-my-network/
I found the text below. Does anyone know if it is still true?
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
I can disagree -- nginx does everythi
ge -
From: "Jonathan Vanasco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Clinton Gormley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "modperl list"
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: caching reverse proxy config+init scripts
On Nov 8, 2007, at 5:50 AM, Clinton Gor
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
I can disagree -- nginx does everything that pound does, plus will
handle your vanilla static files and even use fcgi to handle php and
other stuff
Reading these responses I think a generic config is
On Nov 8, 2007, at 5:50 AM, Clinton Gormley wrote:
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
configure, fast, stable, and makes the whole SSL and load balancing
dead
easy.
I can disagree -- nginx does everything that pound does, plus will
handle your vanilla s
> Although, I would go for something like pound doing the proxying for
> me, instead of mod_proxy
I can't agree more!
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
configure, fast, stable, and makes the whole SSL and load balancing dead
easy.
Pound++
Clint
Randal is the master wizard, so you might wanna read that article in detail.
Although, I would go for something like pound doing the proxying for
me, instead of mod_proxy
I like to run apache on an unprivileged port, so that's an added
bonus, plus pound will take care of ssl too.
On 11/8/07, Ran
> "John" == John ORourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Hi folks,
John> I'm about to write a generic set of init scripts and config files to make
John> setting up dual apache servers (one light proxy/cache/ssl, one heavy
mod_perl)
John> easy.
John> Am I reinventing the wheel?
John> If no
Hi folks,
I'm about to write a generic set of init scripts and config files to
make setting up dual apache servers (one light proxy/cache/ssl, one
heavy mod_perl) easy.
Am I reinventing the wheel?
If not I'll post a link here when I'm done.
cheers
John
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05 Mar 2004,
petersm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> RewriteRule ^/(intranet/.*\.cgi)$ http://127.0.0.1:8181/$1 [P,L]
> 68.52.48.147 - - [05/Mar/2004:10:16:23 -0600]
> [extranet.venzia.com/sid#a0a904c][rid#a0c690c/initial] (1) go-ahead with proxy
> request prox
ECTED]>
To: "mod_perl list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:30:28 -0500
Subject: Proxy Config
> Greetings,
>
> Using Fedora Core 1
> Apache 1.3.29
> mod_perl 1.29
>
> Aparently I am just not understanding something and would like to ask t
Greetings,
Using Fedora Core 1
Apache 1.3.29
mod_perl 1.29
Aparently I am just not understanding something and would like to ask this
list for some help. I'm trying to set up a non-mod_perl proxy server as the
front end which would then forward requests for certain files of certain
applications t
HTTP_HOST in the URL (well, at least, that's how
> it's currently coded). Given that need, how can I avoid looking like an
> open proxy? Is the modperl port acting like a default proxy?
> Commenting out that RewriteRule stops the behavior, so port 80 is not
> acting like a
From: "Ged Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Vincent Kargatis wrote:
>
> > I have an apache server using mod_proxy that is acting like an open
> > proxy even though I have ProxyRequests turned Off.
> > [sinp]
> > Perhaps I'm missing something simple:
>
> How about this?
>
> http://
Hi there,
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Vincent Kargatis wrote:
> I have an apache server using mod_proxy that is acting like an open
> proxy even though I have ProxyRequests turned Off.
> [sinp]
> Perhaps I'm missing something simple:
How about this?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_proxy.html#acces
acting like a proxy by itself. Should I add some proxy config in the
modperl conf to deliberately set proxy=off?
Thanks for any pointers,
vince
--
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
17 matches
Mail list logo
