Which of these was the final verdict? I talked to Stas a while ago and he was
for committing it
which I'd like to do to resolve this issue.
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Index: xs/Apache2/SubRequest/Apache2__SubRequest.h
> ===
> --- xs/Apac
:-)
Stas, that looks like it fixes it... (slight change of code)
if (r->main) {
modperl_config_req_t *rcfg = modperl_config_req_get(r->main);
+ if (rcfg->wbucket)
MP_RUN_CROAK(modperl_wbucket_flush(rcfg->wbucket, FALSE),
"Apache2::SubReq
Scott Penrose wrote:
[...]
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7bef73d in modperl_wbucket_flush (wb=0x0, add_flush_bucket=0)
at modperl_filter.c:236
#1 0xb7a7efaf in mpxs_ap_run_sub_req (r=0x84e1708) at
Apache2__SubRequest.h:25
#2 0xb7a7f55b in XS_Apache2__SubRequest_run (cv=0x8351e78) at
SubRequest.xs:83
You have two choices, 'modperl' OR 'perl-script'.
'default' is part of httpd core not a mod_perl extension.
Thanks but that is correct and my intention.
You have many choices, modperl and perl-script is only for perl,
default-handler is for the built in default handler (basically files).
T
Scott Penrose wrote:
>
> SetHandler modperl
> PerlResponseHandler Zaltana::ExpandTest::response
> PerlOutputFilterHAndler Zaltana::ExpandTest
>
>
> SetHandler default
> PerlOutputFilterHAndler Zaltana::ExpandTest
>
> It should be noted that the Subrequest can be anything -
After banging my head all day I have narrowed this down just a little...
I had a terrible time working out WHY the Test code works but nothing
else does. And I have finally solved that, but not why.
The answer is which Handler for the original content being filtered.
I added a simple handler
You can't test mod_perl modules from the command line, Scott. Only
running under a mod_perl interpreter.
Dooh. I didn't know that. Mine have always worked - I guess I just
have not come across the thing that does not work :-) Until now.
Right, that worked in mod_perl - still seg faults, so
Scott Penrose wrote:
On 05/07/2006, at 5:47, Stas Bekman wrote:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/
filters.html#HTTP_Request_vs__Connection_Filters
OK Some very weird and interesting problems here. I think they are
bugs, but I am not certain.
Firstly - if you write the code..
On 05/07/2006, at 5:47, Stas Bekman wrote:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/
filters.html#HTTP_Request_vs__Connection_Filters
OK Some very weird and interesting problems here. I think they are
bugs, but I am not certain.
Firstly - if you write the code... (straight from the exa
Scott Penrose wrote:
On 04/07/2006, at 20:53, Scott Penrose wrote:
On 04/07/2006, at 17:30, Stas Bekman wrote:
Scott Penrose wrote:
Is this a request or a connection filter? It won't work as a
connection filter (r is not available there).
It is an ouptut filter.
But what output filter
On 04/07/2006, at 20:53, Scott Penrose wrote:
On 04/07/2006, at 17:30, Stas Bekman wrote:
Scott Penrose wrote:
Is this a request or a connection filter? It won't work as a
connection filter (r is not available there).
It is an ouptut filter.
But what output filter? There are two:
http://per
On 04/07/2006, at 17:30, Stas Bekman wrote:
Scott Penrose wrote:
Is this a request or a connection filter? It won't work as a
connection filter (r is not available there).
It is an ouptut filter.
But what output filter? There are two:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/
filter
Scott Penrose wrote:
Is this a request or a connection filter? It won't work as a
connection filter (r is not available there).
It is an ouptut filter.
But what output filter? There are two:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/filters.html#HTTP_Request_vs__Connection_Filters
Wha
Is this a request or a connection filter? It won't work as a
connection filter (r is not available there).
It is an ouptut filter.
What's the core's backtrace?
I will generate this tomorrow (don't have access to the machine today).
Thanks
Scott
P.S. I have done a temporary work around wh
Scott Penrose wrote:
Hey Guys
I wrote a simple Filter which calls a subrequest - and started by doing
this very simply along the SSI style lines...
Please note - that although I could do this on the fly rather than
buffer, the end result for my code requires capture of the content, so
ju
Hey Guys
I wrote a simple Filter which calls a subrequest - and started by
doing this very simply along the SSI style lines...
Please note - that although I could do this on the fly rather than
buffer, the end result for my code requires capture of the content,
so just imagine that bit is
16 matches
Mail list logo
