Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-03-07 Thread Torsten Förtsch
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:14:20 Vincent Veyron wrote: > I am a tiny one-man company using mod_perl with great success(*) and > pleasure, and your post has me very worried that it could end in a > hurry So am I and so are many (perhaps most) of the other contributors. What I am trying to say

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-29 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On 29 Feb 2012, at 19:33, Dan Axtell wrote: > > Basically I want to have various virtual hosts be reverse proxied to various > back end servers (e.g. mod_perl for some legacy apps, a Catalyst app under > fast CGI). I tried this with Nginx and it all seemed to work but what I > discovered is

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dan Axtell wrote: > Basically I want to have various virtual hosts be reverse proxied to various > back end servers (e.g. mod_perl for some legacy apps, a Catalyst app under > fast CGI).  I tried this with Nginx and it all seemed to work but what I > discovered is

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-29 Thread Dan Axtell
> > There's also a talk I gave a couple of years ago about non-plack > options, like nginx+fastcgi: > http://elem.com/~perrin/web_arch.pdf.gz > Thanks for posting this. I understand the general idea of having a lightweight server on port 80 to handle static content and reverse proxying to ano

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-29 Thread Vincent Veyron
Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 17:27 -0500, Perrin Harkins a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jan Dubois wrote: > > I find this talk an excellent overview of all the different ways to > > deploy Perl (PSGI) applications: > > > > http://www.slideshare.net/miyagawa/deploying-plack-web-applicat

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jan Dubois wrote: > I find this talk an excellent overview of all the different ways to > deploy Perl (PSGI) applications: > > http://www.slideshare.net/miyagawa/deploying-plack-web-applications-oscon-2011-8706659 There's also a talk I gave a couple of years ago a

RE: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Jan Dubois
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Vincent Veyron wrote: > Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 13:46 -0500, Perrin Harkins a écrit : > > > Even if mod_perl someday stops being developed for new versions of > > perl and apache, there will be no immediate need to move off it and > > plenty of alternatives available. > > Do

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent Veyron
Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 13:46 -0500, Perrin Harkins a écrit : > Even if mod_perl someday stops being developed for new versions of > perl and apache, there will be no immediate need to move off it and > plenty of alternatives available. > Do you think nginx+perl could be one of those alternat

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Randolf Richardson
> 2012/2/28 Vincent Veyron : > > I am a tiny one-man company using mod_perl with great success(*) and > > pleasure, and your post has me very worried that it could end in a > > hurry :-( I depend on mod_perl2 for nearly all the web sites that I maintain, and I've been trying to encourage

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Perrin Harkins
2012/2/28 Vincent Veyron : > I am a tiny one-man company using mod_perl with great success(*) and > pleasure, and your post has me very worried that it could end in a > hurry :-( Don't panic! There's no immediate danger to mod_perl, and most people are not trying to run on the very latest version

Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent Veyron
Le mercredi 22 février 2012 à 13:37 +0100, Torsten Förtsch a écrit : > Unfortunately, last year generated quite a lot of work. There was perl 5.14 > with a few incompatible changes and the upcoming httpd 2.4. Not to forget the > transition from LWP 5.x to LWP 6.x which our test-suite is based up

Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1

2012-02-22 Thread Torsten Förtsch
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 13:49:41 Brian Millett wrote: > I guess I'm asking is anyone has made any progress with mod_perl with the > new httpd 2.4 ?? There is quite a lot that has changed in httpd from 2.2 to 2.4. Last summer I have worked on porting modperl a bit. The result is available at

Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1

2012-02-21 Thread Fred Moyer
Thanks for the spot. We're rolling rc3 for 2.0.6 right now, I have cc'd the dev list about this issue. I may have some tuits to look at this, but am guessing someone else will fix it more quickly. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Brian Millett wrote: > Well, its a no go, even after checking out

trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1

2012-02-21 Thread Brian Millett
Well, its a no go, even after checking out the latest SVN code, Problem is the ‘conn_rec’ structure has changed. It no longer has 'remote_ip' defined in it. [bpm]$ make cd "src/modules/perl" && make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/bpm/src/apache/mod_perl-2.0/src/modules/perl' gcc -I/home/bpm