in case anyone cares, i filed a bug for this:
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=62293
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:35:54 +0200, Davy Brion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> about six weeks ago, i thought i found a memory leak in the Regular
> Expressions part of Mono, and i mailed a tes
about six weeks ago, i thought i found a memory leak in the Regular
Expressions part of Mono, and i mailed a testcase to the mono list but
Gonzalo said the problem didn't occur when he tried it. This was around
the mono 1.0 beta2 timeframe iirc.
On Linux, i don't have that problem anymore, but i'
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:21:20 +0200, Davy Brion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:05:42 +1200, Rob Brown-Bayliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, What is required to run an app on windows?
> >
> > Also what cant I use? I imagin
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:05:42 +1200, Rob Brown-Bayliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, What is required to run an app on windows?
>
> Also what cant I use? I imagine I would not be able to use some gnome
> features, like GConf, what other traps might I find?
i have an applicatin which is supp
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:29:07 -0400, Erik Dasque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'd love any feedback on this installer.
a user who tried my gtk# aplication on windows with your gtk#
installer got the following error:
System.ArgumentNullException: Key cannot be null.
Parameter name: key
at Syst
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:14:29 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is Mono 1.0 mirrored somewhere? Any other ideas?
try installing the Red Carpet software for Suse 9.1, then subscribe to
the mono channel, and install the mono 1.0 packages this way... this
is probably the eas
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:04:19 +0200, Dirk O. Siebnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am sorry to report that the gtk-sharp RPM requires libgtkhtml3.1_7,
> which is not part of SUSE 9.1 Professional, and not bundled in the
> mono-all.zip archive either, as was the case in beta 3. Can you please
>
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 08:44:25 +1000, Tracy Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the file takes up 9.9 MB of disk space
the mono-all.zip file is much larger than that. your download was
definitely corrupt.
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:13:08 +0200, FabrÃcio Santos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I got the same problem using the mono rpms and sorted it out by compiling it
> from sources myself.
odd... i installed the rpms as released by the mono team for FC2 and
they worked perfectly. How did you install t
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:23:03 -0400, Erik Dasque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, do you need Mono there, on Windows ? You can just rely on .NET.
> As for GTK/GTK#, we have an installer coming very soon for Windows.
I have an application which uses GTK# and i'd like to release a
windows versio
Hey guys,
Monodoc doesn't appear to have documentation for the Mono namespace. i
was wondering how i can add this documentation to Monodoc?
regards,
Davy Brion
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo
com/show_bug.cgi?id=46609)
thanks,
Davy Brion
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
first
and then you'll be able to use GTK# well enough". As i said before, it's
like telling people to learn C before they can learn C# and we all know
that's not necessary.
kind regards,
davy brion
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
efinitely be a step in the right direction.
I hope i haven't offended anyone, but please think about this.
kind regards,
davy brion
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Hey guys,
i'd like to hear some arguments over which one is better or has the most
promising future. Personally i'd prefer to use QT# because i'm a KDE user,
but if GTK# is better or has a better future, then i'd rather go with GTK#.
Has anyone used them both? If so, can you please comment on
st 2003 17:05, Davy Brion wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> just trying to install mono from CVS and when i issue the following
> commands:
>
> cd mono &&
> ./autogen.sh --prefix=/opt/mono-cvs/24082003 &&
> make fullbuild
>
> then i get the following error afte
local as a prefix even though i used a
different prefix... should i use another build method if i want to make sure
that the build gets put in it's own directory? (i wanna make sure my cvs
version of mono is in a totally different place than my 0.26 ver
ontrol (preferably open source and
using System.Windows.Forms) that works on both Linux and Windows, please let
me know because then i'll probably just use that instead, unless i can get
this DLL working.
Thanks in advance,
Davy Brion
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
18 matches
Mail list logo