der the CD itself the "archive". It works for me.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Michel SUCH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bitrate for archival quality (no perceivable
Well,
It depends on what you want to archive.
I use to archive radio broadcasts of interest for me, and, when in stereo,
I use a simple -q 0 --strictly-enforce-iso
which means 128 kbps.
it's good enough.
Now, for music at cd quality, nothing absolutely fine.
I have several nome mp3 playing m
That's pretty strong. How about "I would not" or "You should not".
If that's too much typing an IMHO would suffice.
"no perceivable differences" implies a very subjective topic as there are no doubt
differences in what each of us is capable of percieving.
r3mix preset works for me, with my ear
| OdesÃlatel: Olaf Marzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| I'd like to know the lame developer's opinion about the bitrate to chose
to
| have mp3s with no perceivable differences from the original (for 99% of
| people, 100% is possible only with WAVs).
| I always chose VBR q=2 or 3, in order to have a "
I'd like to know the lame developer's opinion about the bitrate to chose to
have mp3s with no perceivable differences from the original (for 99% of
people, 100% is possible only with WAVs).
I always chose VBR q=2 or 3, in order to have a "medium" bitrate of 192-224.
I'm asking this to you becaus
