ing the
supportpac route.
Regards
Tim A
-Original Message-
From: Jxrgen Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 26 March 2004 6:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
well, thats no big deal, it's just a new version of the source... The rework
ha
:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
well, thats no big deal, it's just a new version of the source... The rework
have saved me a lot of work, to enhance it even more ;o)
The biggest problem can be the search engines/spiders, which will find this
version 2.0 o
ct: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
The biggest problem can be the search engines/spiders, which will find this
version 2.0 of the program, so newbies will download the source instead of
the maintained version. So maybe I should send a mail here and on
www.MQSeries.Net when there are new ve
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:59:55 -0600
Actually Sid, you just released it. :-0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Actually Sid, you just released it. :-0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
G'Day Jxrgen,
Well I went a bit overboard with the addit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:31:16 +1000
G'Day all,
Has anyone tested the CON= commands in the latest version of BlockIP2.c ??
I get odd results when the host IP
Title: Message
G'Day
all,
Has
anyone tested the CON= commands in the latest version of BlockIP2.c
??
I get
odd results when the host IP I am on is different to the pattern to match on, it
seams that the user id is matched but the IP is ignored... not quite what I
would have expected which
