On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 01:16:20AM +0200, Lars Aronsson wrote:
> Very interesting statistics, but is it really realistic to impose
> stricter rules for how users should name things?
They're not rules, they're guidelines. I also know I'm not the only person
who has wondered whether to write "UK", "
Nikki wrote:
> I was curious about the distribution of countries for bootlegs
> [1] and I noticed [...] we should be a bit more consistent. :)
Very interesting statistics, but is it really realistic to impose
stricter rules for how users should name things? Aren't computers
a lot better at fo
great email
Nikki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was curious about the distribution of countries for bootlegs [1] and I
> noticed that the untitled bootleg style [2] doesn't really consist of much
> and live bootleg style [3] still doesn't expand the location very much. A
> general style appears to have emer
I haven't noticed catalogue numbers changing between
minor variants of a work like that. Usually I just
see (1920 version) or (french version) or something
like that.
But isn't this all moot? Catalogue numbers are pretty
essential for "regular" classical works, and there
seems to be some consens
Hi,
I was curious about the distribution of countries for bootlegs [1] and I
noticed that the untitled bootleg style [2] doesn't really consist of much
and live bootleg style [3] still doesn't expand the location very much. A
general style appears to have emerged in some places and I'd like to get
On 4/22/06, Marco Sola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Adam Golding> lol.
you were discussing leaving the opus number out for operas
Ah, sorry.
> but if we leave it out, where does it go?
Nowhere, it's not needed nor useful: it's easy to find an
opera by its (often very strange) n
dj empirical wrote:
> is it possible to auto-detect that AR once the URL is pasted in, as
> the others (ASIN, Discogs, etc.) do?
Done. Will be included in the next server release.
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.or
From: Adam Golding> lol.
you were discussing leaving the opus number out for operas
Ah, sorry.
> but if we leave it out, where does it go?
Nowhere, it's not needed nor useful: it's easy to find an
opera by its (often very strange) name.
Ciao
MArco (ClutchEr2)
__
lol. you were discussing leaving the opus number out for operas--but if we leave it out, where does it go?On 4/22/06, Marco Sola <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i agree with this only if we create a separate field
for opus numbers etc.
Why? How are they related? Or is this a sort of
ransom
> i agree with this only if we create a separate field
for opus numbers etc.
Why? How are they related? Or is this a sort of
ransom?
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/li
10 matches
Mail list logo
