[mb-style] RFV: OnlineCommunityRelationshipType (renamed from MySpaceRelationshipType)

2006-08-13 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
> Looking at your LiveJournal examples that you added on the test server,> it seems like over 3/4 of them are for community pages with only a few> for personal pages.  Is this typical for Russian artists usage of LJ? It's typical for most interesting people to use LJ nowdays.However this only appli

Re: [mb-style] Re: RFV: OnlineCommunityRelationshipType

2006-08-13 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
2006/8/13, Brian G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: yes.go to the site and click on music.where is livejournal.coms section regarding music?(hint: there isn't one.) Sections are just a semantic sugar. Where is LiveJournal.com's _content_ regarding music? I can show you if you doubt. LiveJournal have just muc

[mb-style] Re: RFV: OnlineCommunityRelationshipType

2006-08-11 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
> I think the number of editors adding ARs for Russian artists (and the > number of Russian artists) is probably correspondingly smaller than the > number of editors who were adding ARs for US artists (and the number of > US artists). So this doesn't speak to the importance of LJ URLs per se, >

[mb-style] Re: RFV: OnlineCommunityRelationshipType

2006-08-11 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
th LJ.. LJ has NOTHING to do with music. Ilya Kasnacheev wrote: > > > And LiveJournal deals _a lot_ with Russian music and artists. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-mb-style--RFV%3A-OnlineCommunityRelationshipType-%28renamed-from-MySpaceRelationshipT

Re: [mb-style] RFV: OnlineCommunityRelationshipType

2006-08-10 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
personally I'd rather see work on URL ARs put into the ability to link to*music* related sites such as purevolume.com or indie911.com or mp3.com orThe Podsafe Music Network or garageband.com I think having the MySpace AR is acceptable since MySpace is a site thatdeals _a lot_ with music and artist

[mb-style] Ответ: RFV: OnlineCommunityRel ationshipType (renamed from MySpaceRela tionshipType)

2006-08-10 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Alexander Dupuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: In July, Ilya Kasnacheev proposed new Artist--URL relationship types to support links to LiveJournal and other blog sites (in addition to MySpace). [1][2] After some discussion on the -style list, I proposed adapting the existing MySpace relationship ty

[mb-style] Re: RFC: New URL relation types: Has blog at , Has LiveJournal at

2006-07-19 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
OK, but we should state this explicitly for every newcomer to see. 2006/7/19, Oleg Rowaa[SR13] V. Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Greetings. Monday, July 17, 2006, 3:21:37 PM Frederik. wrote: > For LiveJournal, point to http://[user].livejournal.com/ for personal > accounts and http://community.liv

[mb-style] Re: RFC: New URL relation types: Has blog at , Has LiveJournal at

2006-07-17 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
I've tried this on test server. It works fine, but: Where should the link point to? Should it be userinfo page, or the actual blog page? We should decide this once and state clearly. I would vote for the actual blog page :) 2006/7/17, Stefan Kestenholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 7/16/06, Don Redma

Re: [mb-style] RFC: New URL relation types: Has blog at , Has LiveJournal at

2006-07-15 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
>> Why needed?: As of today, musicbrainz have the relation "Have the>> MySpace page at".  MySpace is not only blog service in universe, >> neither it does have monopoly on music people/bands pages.> I like it. Essentially it means to generalize the current MySpace> relationship type. IIRC someone o

[mb-style] RFC: New URL relation types: Has blog at , Has LiveJournal at

2006-07-14 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Proposal: New URL relation types: Has blog at , Has LiveJournal at Why needed?: As of today, musicbrainz have the relation "Have the MySpace page at". MySpace is not only blog service in universe, neither it does have monopoly on music people/bands pages. A lot of musicians and bands have blogs