Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to group rele ases into “cultural identifiers” for fut ure importing.

2008-10-10 Thread Kuno Woudt
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:53:14PM -0700, Kerensky97 wrote: > > "Earliest Release of": > I think most of these would apply for being grouped with "Cultural > Identifiers". Its basically the same release from a different date and > possibly a few more tracks, which as I understand is the main poin

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to group rele ases into “cultural identifiers” for fut ure importing.

2008-10-09 Thread Gioele
Kerensky97 wrote: > I just want to mention that "Cultural Identifier" is the BBC's term and I > don't like it. Robert prefers the term "release groups" which I think is > much better. What about "Release variations"? "Groups" sound too related to "box sets" to me. -- Gioele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to group rele ases into “cultural identifiers” for fut ure importing.

2008-10-08 Thread Kuno Woudt
Hello, Generally, sounds like a good idea. I'm in favour :). One question... On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:58:31PM -0700, Kerensky97 wrote: > *Some existing ARs a re already similar to grouping by “Cultural > Identifiers”. Namely “Remasters”, and “Later Release”. There is obviously > going to b