Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Don and Jan,
You realize this would mean a very big annotation, since each track
was from a different source?
[and]
Not practical, to say the least ;-) And anyhow, annotations are not in
the database way of thinking.
Well then you should propose a track--url Advan
2006/4/11, Beth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I see your point, and I am trying to straddle an argument, and come to
> acceptable. Not truly step on toes, simply see to the future and strive for
> lack of loss to data. ;)
I know :-) And this is what makes this collective work interesting. No
single perso
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 5:17 AM
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Contextual information in track title
Not practical, to say the least ;-) And anyhow, annotations are not in
the database way of thinking. For example, if I wanted to retrieve a
list of the albums where
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Beth wrote:
Is a large album annotation so daunting? I've seen a few. I offered to do
it. So far I haven't seen even the comment annotation noted. Yet less a
request that I do it. I am more than happy to do it.
Large annotations can currently cause problems with some repli
ROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederic
> Da Vitoria
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 3:07 AM
> To: MusicBrainz style discussion
> Subject: Re: [mb-style] Contextual information in track title
>
> 2006/4/10, Jan van Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On
TECTED] On Behalf Of Frederic
Da Vitoria
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 3:07 AM
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Contextual information in track title
2006/4/10, Jan van Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 4/10/06, Don Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
&
2006/4/10, Jan van Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 4/10/06, Don Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Um, sorry if I disagree with everyone here, but IMO this is
> > ExtraTitleInformation which does not belong into the TrackTitle and should
> > be left to the AlbumAnnotation (except if it were
On 4/10/06, Don Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:27:32 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
> > About mod 4578355,
> >
> > The original title was: "Canitque de Jean Racine From the Film Babe",
> > clearly wrong since "From the Film Babe" is not really part of the
> > title.
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:27:32 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
About mod 4578355,
The original title was: "Canitque de Jean Racine From the Film Babe",
clearly wrong since "From the Film Babe" is not really part of the
title. After asking advice in the IRC, Nyght added a mod to change it
to "Ca
> 2006/4/9, Cristov Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > 2006/4/8, Beth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Therefore, the tag would show the annotation in perhaps
> the comment
> > > box on whatever supported format the user utilized for
> their music
> > > library.
> >
> > The tagger should show informa
2006/4/9, Cristov Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2006/4/8, Beth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Therefore, the tag would show the annotation in perhaps the comment
> > box on whatever supported format the user utilized for
> > their music library.
>
> The tagger should show information the way the user
> 2006/4/8, Beth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Therefore, the tag would show the annotation in perhaps the comment
> box on whatever supported format the user utilized for
> their music library.
The tagger should show information the way the user wants the information
displayed. How it appears in the d
2006/4/8, Beth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The way I look at this. We're cataloging albums. Granted, we have a tagger
> and tagging capabilities. However, it is not our knowledge if end user does
> not have the album, or does not keep the album all together. Eventually the
> tagger will be able to add t
April 08, 2006 9:31 AM
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Contextual information in track title
2006/4/8, Cristov Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > About mod 4578355,
> >
> > The original title was: "Canitque de Jean Racine From the
> > Film Babe"
After thinking a little more about it, the real problem here is that I
couldn't find a clear style rule about this (although this situation
should not be really rare).
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.mus
2006/4/8, Cristov Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > About mod 4578355,
> >
> > The original title was: "Canitque de Jean Racine From the
> > Film Babe", clearly wrong since "From the Film Babe" is not
> > really part of the title. After asking advice in the IRC,
> > Nyght added a mod to change it to
> About mod 4578355,
>
> The original title was: "Canitque de Jean Racine From the
> Film Babe", clearly wrong since "From the Film Babe" is not
> really part of the title. After asking advice in the IRC,
> Nyght added a mod to change it to "Canitque de Jean Racine
> (from Babe)". I would have
About mod 4578355,
The original title was: "Canitque de Jean Racine From the Film Babe",
clearly wrong since "From the Film Babe" is not really part of the
title. After asking advice in the IRC, Nyght added a mod to change it
to "Canitque de Jean Racine (from Babe)". I would have rather used
"Cani
18 matches
Mail list logo
