On Jul 25, 2008, at 12:01 AM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
>
Everything snipped, I agreed with.
> 1. There's lots of purely editorial flaws, not policy-related, in
> our docs.
> Clearly stale content labelled as under revision. Poorly structured
> pages.
> Discussion placed inconsistently within pol
Rob:
Robert Kaye wrote:
>
> Jim: I would love to hear what you think of my ideas and how you would
> tackle the task of defining a working style process!
>
I've been turning over my thoughts on the style process, so it's taken me a
couple of weeks to reply.
First off, everything you write
On Jul 10, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
>
> Of course it's obvious to anyone who sees how he dresses that Jim is
> hopelessly unqualified to be a "style leader".
And apparently you don't understand the concept of a private email
either. ;-)
Seriously.. I think you understand the task
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:28:58PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> This is absolutely not against Jim, but do we really need a style leader? I
> mean, do we need someone to hold such a formal position?
Yes :)
-- kuno / warp.
___
Musicbrainz-style m
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Jim DeLaHunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robert Kaye wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >>> FYI: http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=332
> >
> > If you have any thoughts on Jim being the style leader, please drop me
> > a *private* email.
> >
>
> Of course it's obvious to any
Robert Kaye wrote:
>
> ...
>>> FYI: http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=332
>
> If you have any thoughts on Jim being the style leader, please drop me
> a *private* email.
>
Of course it's obvious to anyone who sees how he dresses that Jim is
hopelessly unqualified to be a "style leader".
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Andrew Conkling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 16:28, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Robert Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 10, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
>>> >
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 16:28, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Robert Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 10, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
>> > On Jun 30, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
>> >> FYI: http://blog.musicbrainz.org/
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Robert Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 10, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
>
> > On Jun 30, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
> >
> >> FYI: http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=332
> >>
> >> Panda won't be the next style leader -- real life swallowed
On Jul 10, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
>
>> FYI: http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=332
>>
>> Panda won't be the next style leader -- real life swallowed him
>> whole. :-(
>
> Sigh. Zero responses in total.
Ooops, that was not correct. Ji
On Jun 30, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
> FYI: http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=332
>
> Panda won't be the next style leader -- real life swallowed him
> whole. :-(
Sigh. Zero responses in total.
Does anyone have any thoughts on how to proceed with the Style Council?
--
--ruaok Som
FYI: http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=332
Panda won't be the next style leader -- real life swallowed him
whole. :-(
--
--ruaok Somewhere in Texas a village is *still* missing its idiot.
Robert Kaye -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --http://mayhem-chaos.net
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
