looks whose whining now..
Robert Kaye wrote:
>
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Jan van Thiel wrote:
>> I think that if e.g. inhouseuk (sorry to (ab)use your name, just
>> giving an example), a moderator with a spotless record, had requested
>> these, they would've been added almost instantaneously
On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Jan van Thiel wrote:
I think that if e.g. inhouseuk (sorry to (ab)use your name, just
giving an example), a moderator with a spotless record, had requested
these, they would've been added almost instantaneously.
I disagree.
If a moderator with a "perfect record" a
On 3/27/06, Robert Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, what is done is done, and at least
> we don't have to listen to the incessant whining about adding the
> damned vacuum cleaner. Let's move on.
I don't agree. Brian has been asking about this for a *long* time.
Maybe not in the best way, but
incessant whining?
and you call Me confrontational..
Robert Kaye wrote:
>
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:53 AM, Don Redman wrote:
>> Well, then I'd say we should add this now and let Brian add the
>> appropriate Relationships.
>>
>> I mean if we finally have a rule, we should use it :-)
>
> Yes, but...
On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:24 AM, Don Redman wrote:
And I am strongly opposed to removing your RelType editor privileges.
Agreed. So far all Luks' actions were following valid bugs or
instructions from the style secretary.
--
--ruaok Somewhere in Texas a village is *still* missing its
On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:53 AM, Don Redman wrote:
Well, then I'd say we should add this now and let Brian add the
appropriate Relationships.
I mean if we finally have a rule, we should use it :-)
Yes, but
Luks went ahead and added the vacuum cleaner. Fine. However, in the
future I want to
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:31:39 +0200, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
Ok, I've added this and http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1228 to
the instrument tree.
Some people will probably disagree, so please tell me, I'll ask someone
to remove my link editor privs and won't do it anymore.
What?
Thi
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:34:18 +0200, Brian Gurtler wrote:
Stefan Kestenholz wrote:
brian: Is it true that this artist performed the vacuum cleaner on many
occasions, and this is documented in bootlegs/released recordings? if
that is the case, then we should add it.
yes it's true.
i am not
Ok, I've added this and http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1228 to the
instrument tree.
Some people will probably disagree, so please tell me, I'll ask someone to
remove my link editor privs and won't do it anymore.
Lukas
Brian Gurtler wrote:
yes it's true.
i am not making this stuff u
yes it's true.
i am not making this stuff up. :)
i have been in the process of trying to compile a full list of times
that Jon Fishman alone has used the vacuum as an instrument out of all
Phish live bootleg recordings. Phish also offer hundreds of official
recordings (actual CDs as well as downloa
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:47:10 +0200, Steve Wyles wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote:
The current "Recording Engineer" debate is a good example: Simon
thought he was requesting a veto (but did not say so explicitly), but
Steve put forward a dissenting oppinion (he did not label it a
Steve Wyles wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote:
The current "Recording Engineer" debate is a good example: Simon
thought he was requesting a veto (but did not say so explicitly), but
Steve put forward a dissenting oppinion (he did not label it as a
veto) and spared another discussio
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote:
The current "Recording Engineer" debate is a good example: Simon thought he
was requesting a veto (but did not say so explicitly), but Steve put forward
a dissenting oppinion (he did not label it as a veto) and spared another
discussion.
I've just check
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:04:25 +0200, Stefan Kestenholz wrote:
I have to admit that it is sometimes hard to understand why changes like
that take such a lot of time, or the deal that is made out of them.
please
do not get personal over this, it's not worth it - and will more likely
achieve less
> As far as i know the position of "Instrument Secretary" is
> not held by anyone (including DonRedman) and is still open
> and available.
>
> i didn't call anyone specifically spineless. So I don't see
> that as confrontational. I'm saying in jest, give the
> position to someone who will flip
As far as i know the position of "Instrument Secretary" is not held by
anyone (including DonRedman) and is still open and available.
i didn't call anyone specifically spineless. So I don't see that as
confrontational. I'm saying in jest, give the position to someone who
will flip-flop and not beca
> I've been waiting over 3 months for an instrument to be added
> to MB and jumped through way too many bullshit hoops to get
> to where we are now.
> i'm just looking for it to be added without any further hoops
> like i was told by Redman that it would be once Mos thingy
> went live. It's bee
I've been waiting over 3 months for an instrument to be added to MB and
jumped through way too many bullshit hoops to get to where we are now.
i'm just looking for it to be added without any further hoops like i was
told by Redman that it would be once Mos thingy went live. It's been
live for over
> LOL
> yes, give the position to someone that has no spine and will
> back down at any argument presented to them.
> you know that i'm only confrontational when confronted.. and
> i believe most people that don't have thier head in the
> coulds on IRC realize that as well.
>
> -Brian
>
> btw-
19 matches
Mail list logo
