*Style Leader hat on*
An update on the Champion for this proposal: I've talked to ruaok. He's
rather limited in what time he can devote to the lists (hence why he'd asked
me to propose this for him). This is an AR he'd like to see happen, but
he's busy enough that actively working the proposal
Trying to get this proposal back on track... :)
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Chad Wilson wrote:
> On 7/03/2010 2:56 p.m., Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>
> I think the fear is there'd be tons of URLs linked, but without any
>> context, those URLs don't give much, other than that you know there's
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Chad Wilson wrote:
> On 7/03/2010 2:56 p.m., Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>
> I think the fear is there'd be tons of URLs linked, but without any
>> context, those URLs don't give much, other than that you know there's some
>> news article about the artist on the othe
On 7/03/2010 2:56 p.m., Brian Schweitzer wrote:
I think the fear is there'd be tons of URLs linked, but without
any context, those URLs don't give much, other than that you know
there's some news article about the artist on the other end.
However, if the AR description field cou
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Brian Schweitzer <
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 28, 2010, at 3:12 AM, Chad Wilson wrote:
>>
>> > I'm reading two different concepts here. The original idea for
>> > Guardian in IRC talks
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2010, at 3:12 AM, Chad Wilson wrote:
>
> > I'm reading two different concepts here. The original idea for
> > Guardian in IRC talks about linking to tag/index pages on an artist,
> > which might be sensible. The proposal as it read
On Feb 28, 2010, at 3:12 AM, Chad Wilson wrote:
> I'm reading two different concepts here. The original idea for
> Guardian in IRC talks about linking to tag/index pages on an artist,
> which might be sensible. The proposal as it reads, and the basic
> text of the relationship sounds like a
I'm reading two different concepts here. The original idea for Guardian
in IRC talks about linking to tag/index pages on an artist, which might
be sensible. The proposal as it reads, and the basic text of the
relationship sounds like a free-for-all to link to individual articles,
which I don't
The same had occurred to me, though I'm not 100% decided if such a
potentally large list of URLs would be a good or bad thing; I could see it
almost becoming some sort of fodder for a future "news about artists I'm
subscribed to" rss feed. The origin of this AR was in last week's dev
meeting, wher
I think this needs to be properly clarified as to its intention. People
will start adding links to individual articles about artists or releases
which /surely/ cannot be the goal of this proposal? If that were it
happen it seems to me that it will create an absolute mess of links of
dubious mer
Sorry, that should read Sunday, 2010-03-07.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Brian Schweitzer <
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note: I am sending this RFC on ruoak's behalf; in case of disagreement
> between he and I on this proposal, he's the Idea Champion here, not me - no
> need fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
