okay, I want to add a feature request at this point for RTP and RTCP
streaming in MPD, bot configurable in the config file or through your
favorite client.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2009/01/15 18:09, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
>> My justification: I was trying to fo
On 2009/01/15 18:09, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
> My justification: I was trying to follow KISS principal.
It's exactly the opposite: designing and implementing a brand new
protocol is complex and tedious, all but KISS. When we finish fixing
the shortcomings of your protocol, it'll probably be RTP l
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2009/01/15 12:05, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
>> I've studied some audio streaming problems and existent solutions,
>> and I think that now, you are talking about RTCP over RTP :) Why not
>> to use this protocol? It works over UDP and designe
On 2009/01/15 12:05, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
> I've studied some audio streaming problems and existent solutions,
> and I think that now, you are talking about RTCP over RTP :) Why not
> to use this protocol? It works over UDP and designed for delivering
> real-time audio (and video) over the Inter
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2009/01/14 19:11, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> > When the network between the client and the server is saturated, TCP
>> > sees packet loss, and throttles the connection. We can't do that
>> > easily with UDP, not without losing UDP's advan
On 2009/01/14 19:11, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > When the network between the client and the server is saturated, TCP
> > sees packet loss, and throttles the connection. We can't do that
> > easily with UDP, not without losing UDP's advantages.
>
> Yes, you'd need to have the client monitor the ra
>> I don't get it, what "rate limiting"?
> When the network between the client and the server is saturated, TCP
> sees packet loss, and throttles the connection. We can't do that
> easily with UDP, not without losing UDP's advantages.
Yes, you'd need to have the client monitor the rate at which i
On 2009/01/14 15:52, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
> I've read "Basic stgit usage" in your wiki, but I didn't use it yet
> (I'm new in git)
> If it understood it right, as long as my pathces are not submitted I can
> write a lot of changes in a single path
Yes. You can work on several patches at a time
On 2009/01/14 15:52, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
> > Now let's talk about your definition of "impatient". What do you mean
> > by that?
>
> Client can ask for chunk to quick, and then he will receive duplicated chunk.
You're trying to get around my question ;-)
Define "too quick"! And then define
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2009/01/14 03:37, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
>> Great :)
>> About CamelCase... do you have any code formatting standards?
>> May be in your wiki... I didn't found them, so of course
>> I was trying to copypaste existing functions names and v
On 2009/01/14 03:37, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
> Great :)
> About CamelCase... do you have any code formatting standards?
> May be in your wiki... I didn't found them, so of course
> I was trying to copypaste existing functions names and variables.
No, we don't have it documented. Try not to copy'n
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Max Kellermann wrote:
>
> On 2009/01/10 23:57, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
> > Currently I'm working on MPD visualization stuff.
>
> Hi Vasily,
>
> here's a rough review of the "udpfeed" plugin (commit f0fd78a911d6).
>
> First: I like your coding style, you're using i
On 2009/01/10 23:57, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
> Currently I'm working on MPD visualization stuff.
Hi Vasily,
here's a rough review of the "udpfeed" plugin (commit f0fd78a911d6).
First: I like your coding style, you're using inline functions a lot.
You're writing a lot of source code comments. Ho
On 2009/01/10 23:57, Vasily Stepanov wrote:
> "People mainly just want to listen to music, I don't think people really
> care about visualizations once they loose their fixation w/ a music player
> and get back to just listening to music and doing work."
>
> But I'm doing it just for fun, so nobo
Hi all!
Currently I'm working on MPD visualization stuff.
Yes, I've found shank's opinion here
http://www.musicpd.org/forum/index.php?topic=351.msg1692#msg1692
and I can agree with him
"People mainly just want to listen to music, I don't think people really
care about visualizations once they loos
15 matches
Mail list logo
