> macro index d "=trash"
> macro pager d "=trash"
>
> This will always save the message to the folder "=trash" whenever you
> "delete" it, and mark it for deletion from the current folder. You have
> to clean up =trash yourself when you want it, possibly from the command
> line manually, or
Garry Williams proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> The reason you may want to configure sendmail to do "The Right Thing"
> instead of Suresh's solution is that Suresh's suggestion will cause an
> X-Authentication-Warning header to be included with your message:
This can be solved by adding your
Larry Rosenman writes:
> Greetings,
> I know this isn't a Mutt issue per se, but...
> Does anyone know of a MAILDIR enabled version of slocal? SCO
> supplies slocal as the Local Delivery Agent on UnixWare 7, and I'm
> thinking about making my mailinglist folders maildir...
>
> I'm no
Mikko,
At 2000/11/16/04:47 +0200 Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you're building Mutt, you can use the --with-exec-shell=...
> directive to specify a shell of your choice. The help text says to
> use this "ONLY if /bin/sh is broken", maybe this qualifies as that.
O.K. Now I ha
David Alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 15 Nov 2000:
> can I somehow get mutt to execute this form of shell-escaped command
> with my choice of shell?
When you're building Mutt, you can use the --with-exec-shell=...
directive to specify a shell of your choice. The help text says to
use thi
Greetings!
When in the index, if I press:
!
I spawn the correct interactive shell (as defined in my ~/.muttrc):
$ grep shell ~/.muttrc
## environment variable in the shell.
set shell=/usr/freeware/bin/bash
I verify this by doing:
$ echo $0
/usr/freeware/bin/bash
However
Greetings,
I know this isn't a Mutt issue per se, but...
Does anyone know of a MAILDIR enabled version of slocal? SCO
supplies slocal as the Local Delivery Agent on UnixWare 7, and I'm
thinking about making my mailinglist folders maildir...
I'm not even sure where slocal comes from.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 03:40:43PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:28:06PM -0800, Luke Ravitch wrote:
> > Cool. I like to compress my archived sent mail, though. I just have:
>
> nod, I do that too, only gpg it in the proccess. do you use the
> +COMPRESSED patch to mutt, s
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:08:30PM - or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Dan Boger thought:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:28:06PM -0800, Luke Ravitch wrote:
> > Cool. I like to compress my archived sent mail, though. I just have:
>
> nod, I do that too, only gpg it in the proccess. do you use
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 02:00:12PM -0500, Jim Toth wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:45:09PM -0600, Jeff Howie
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > I have the author's name specified in my index_format as '%F', which
> > according to the mutt help is 'author name, or recipient name if the
> > message
Jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 15 Nov 2000:
> Should that be `-F' instead of `-f' ?
Nope.
> -F fullname
> Set the full name of the sender.
The "full name" is already specified in the From: header.
> -f name
> Sets the name of the "from"
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:28:06PM -0800, Luke Ravitch wrote:
> Cool. I like to compress my archived sent mail, though. I just have:
nod, I do that too, only gpg it in the proccess. do you use the
+COMPRESSED patch to mutt, so it could read the compressed folders on the
fly? :)
--
Dan Boger
Goblin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 15 Nov 2000:
> This does not accomplish that. Can someone help?
>
> send-hook '~t ^.*@domain.com$' \
> my_hdr From: User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \
> set signature=~/.sig_domain
If you want to execute multiple commands, you must put a ; in betw
iain truskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 15 Nov 2000:
> Aha! The one form of quoting I didn't try! =)
That's kind of weird, because as far as I understand how Mutt handles
quoting when reading in muttrc-files, both should work.
Oh well, I do trust your word that the first form doesn't wor
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 12:08:43AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > I need a work around for mutt or regular unix mail on the following
> > problem. When I sent to some addresses they want to verify my domain or
> > they will not acce
I am trying to set the my_hdr and the signature as
a result of a single hook.
This does not accomplish that. Can someone help?
send-hook '~t ^.*@domain.com$' \
my_hdr From: User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \
set signature=~/.sig_domain
Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 07:49:29PM +, Nollaig MacKenzie wrote:
> After a while, I went to this suggestion,
> which came to this list a few months ago:
>
> set record="+Record/s-`date +%Y-%m`" # default location to save outgoing mail
>
> (makes a new folder each month)
Cool. I like to comp
-: You can set the envelope sender in older mutts with
-: set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -oem -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Should that be `-F' instead of `-f' ?
Here's what `man sendmail' says, but
it didn't answer the question (for me).
-F fullname
Set the full name of t
On 2000.11.15 11:28:01, you,
the extraordinary Luke Ravitch, opined:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:08:40PM -0800, Robert Sweet wrote:
> > Does anyone know how to have a copy of mail sent saved to a
> > mailbox i.e., sent-mail?
>
> set record = sent-mail
>
After a while, I went to this suggest
* Robert Sweet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 20:12]:
> Does anyone know how to have a copy of mail sent saved to a
> mailbox i.e., sent-mail?
set record="=sent-mail" in your ~/.muttrc.
For further details read the section about
"record" in the mutt manual 6.1.
Best regards - Juergen.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:08:40PM -0800, Robert Sweet wrote:
> Does anyone know how to have a copy of mail sent saved to a
> mailbox i.e., sent-mail?
set record = sent-mail
--
Luke
Does anyone know how to have a copy of mail sent saved to a
mailbox i.e., sent-mail?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Under a government which
-o) | imprisons any unjustly, the
Linux, the Choice /\ | true place for a just man is
of a GNU generation _\_v | also in priso
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:45:09PM -0600, Jeff Howie
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I have the author's name specified in my index_format as '%F', which
> according to the mutt help is 'author name, or recipient name if the
> message is from you'. But the index still shows my name ('Jeff Howie')
> fo
I have the author's name specified in my index_format as '%F', which
according to the mutt help is 'author name, or recipient name if the
message is from you'. But the index still shows my name ('Jeff Howie')
for emails that I've bcc'd back to myself.
My email address is no longer the same as my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I need a work around for mutt or regular unix mail on the following
> problem. When I sent to some addresses they want to verify my domain or
> they will not accept the message. My domain is not valid. How can I send
> a message and have cont
Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I've been curious about this one for some time, just wondering if
> there's a way to have mutt return to the index screen after spawning
> an external editor to compose a message?
This has been discussed earlier - like when I asked whether spawning
I need a work around for mutt or regular unix mail on the following
problem. When I sent to some addresses they want to verify my domain or
they will not accept the message. My domain is not valid. How can I send
a message and have control of the internet address in the FROM information
on an A
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, GCS wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As I have read the archive, the old ncurses doesn't support the 'default'
> color. Ok. Is there any alternative for it, or I have to use 'black' for
> example.
yes (I assume you mean something like ncurses 1.8.6 on FreeBSD).
iirc, I implemented default
I've been curious about this one for some time, just wondering if
there's a way to have mutt return to the index screen after spawning
an external editor to compose a message?
This may be asking a bit much, but I'm just curious. :)
For example, I use emacs to as my editor, and so mutt spawns em
Hi!
As I have read the archive, the old ncurses doesn't support the 'default'
color. Ok. Is there any alternative for it, or I have to use 'black' for
example.
Thanks,
Laszlo
* Jeff Howie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15 Nov 2000 08:35]:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 11:07:29AM +1100, iain truskett wrote:
> > I'm attempting to use the following (which seem logical enough for
> > me) to perform folder specific index formatting:
[...]
> > However, they don't work. I get an error:
[..
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 03:03:57PM +0800 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
lang thought:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
>
> > Juergen Salk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 14 Nov 2000:
> > > To make a long story short: How can I make the cursor highlight
> > > the last visited mail
32 matches
Mail list logo
