Hi!
> "Ken" == Ken Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ken> Hi Monty and Sasha,
Ken> Just a quick not to say that's such a great idea that Monty even
Ken> thought of it before! Monty and I discussed this last September, I
Ken> hope we could get something like this in 4.1
Ken> Just a
v" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: Feature idea inspired by bug report
> On Wednesday 06 March 2002 04:35 am, Michael Widenius wrote:
> > Instead of di
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 04:35 am, Michael Widenius wrote:
> Instead of disabling disk based temp tables, we could instead restrict the
> size of them which should be equally good. ?(By setting the disk size
> to 0 you would be able to disable them, but we should not recommend
> this setting).
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:12:32PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> On Monday 04 March 2002 02:41 pm, Vladimir V. Kolpakov wrote:
> > --
> > P.S. so far, it's helpful bug: I use it as catch
> > for poor queries!:)
>
> This actually gives me an idea for a
> feature. --disable-disk-temp-tables - fa
