Re: Better Solution than Multiple Queries?

2004-04-09 Thread beacker
Tim McDonough writes: >The solution I presently have does a query for the first criteria. >Then, I loop through the results of that query and do another query >for each returned row. This produces the desired results but requires >a lot of queries, i.e.-- if the first query returns 1000 customer

Re: Better Solution than Multiple Queries?

2004-04-09 Thread Jigal van Hemert
> I have an application where I want to look for records that match > certain criteria and then for each item found do a second lookup for > additional information. Normally I would do a join. In this case > however I want to display each of the results from the first of the > two criteria whether

Re: Better Solution than Multiple Queries?

2004-04-09 Thread Roger Baklund
* Tim McDonough > I have an application where I want to look for records that match > certain criteria and then for each item found do a second lookup for > additional information. Normally I would do a join. In this case > however I want to display each of the results from the first of the >

RE: Better Solution than Multiple Queries?

2004-04-09 Thread Victor Pendleton
CTED] Sent: 4/9/04 8:20 AM Subject: Better Solution than Multiple Queries? I have an application where I want to look for records that match certain criteria and then for each item found do a second lookup for additional information. Normally I would do a join. In this case however I want to di

Better Solution than Multiple Queries?

2004-04-09 Thread Tim McDonough
I have an application where I want to look for records that match certain criteria and then for each item found do a second lookup for additional information. Normally I would do a join. In this case however I want to display each of the results from the first of the two criteria whether or not the