iginal Message -
> From: "Dan Rossi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Victoria Reznichenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:04 PM
> Subject: RE: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
>
>
> > damn , i read it was
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:02 AM
Subject: RE: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects and not stored procedures
> I'm not sure where you're getting your information ("Typically, db vendors
> recommend you use an exists clause,
In the last episode (Nov 11), Greg Matthews said:
>
> hey, can i hijack my message back?...this thread is about the performance of
> subselects, not stored procedures. go write your own message :-)...
>
> sothe original question is if someone would be nice enough to answer..
>
> > Do any
Dan Rossi wrote:
damn , i read it was 4.1 i guess we have to wait a bit then, i wish i could
program some c ++ to hurry it along a bit, i dont really have access to DB's
like oracle to learn stored procedure stuff
Don't forget that with MySQL, you can link in external procedures though
... i
0:0:02
Arthur
-Original Message-
From: Greg Matthews [mailto:greg55@;ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects and not stored procedures
hey, can i hijack my message back?...this thread is about the perform
aid is null
Thanks,
Greg.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Rossi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Victoria Reznichenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:04 PM
Subject: RE: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
> damn , i read it
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
daniel,
Monday, November 11, 2002, 3:51:25 AM, you wrote:
d> will 4.1 hopefully have stored procedure functionality ?
Nope.
Stored procedures will be implemented around v5.0
--
For t
daniel,
Monday, November 11, 2002, 3:51:25 AM, you wrote:
d> will 4.1 hopefully have stored procedure functionality ?
Nope.
Stored procedures will be implemented around v5.0
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Greg Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:16 AM
>Subject: Re: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
>
>
>> Greg Matthews wrote:
>>
>> >clause) instead of EXISTS -- seems
-- Original Message -
From: "Michael T. Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
> Greg Matthews wrote:
>
> >clause) in
Greg Matthews wrote:
clause) instead of EXISTS -- seems like a "tail wagging the dog" strategy.
Isn't EXISTS a lot more efficient than an inner join?
Well, its more efficient if it exists, I guess ... but if it doesn't
exist on your platform (MySQL), then its pretty inefficient, really.
We'r
d Fuchs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
> In article <014701c288a4$1b1bb550$0100a8c0@dev>,
> "Greg Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Your call.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 09:29:52PM +1100, Greg Matthews wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I'm not a C/C++ coder so couldn't really help unless a binary was
> available.
>
> At the same time, I understand that you'd be wasting your time building
> binaries unless you were happy that the code was at a certain l
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 05:51:43PM +1100, Greg Matthews wrote:
> >
> > It would be a huge help to
t yet optimised (it will be started after finishing
main subselect constructions).
Regards,
Jocelyn
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Zawodny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 1
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 05:51:43PM +1100, Greg Matthews wrote:
>
> It would be a huge help to get hold of MySql 4.1.
>
> What's "shaken out" mean? Is 4.1 still mid-development, or is it in
> alpha, more or less finished, and needs debugging?
>
> Is there anyway soon that someone could build and
is in a semi-usable state.
Greg.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Zawodny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
>
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +1100, Greg Matthews wrote:
> All,
>
> Anyone have any rough idea when 4.1 (with SubSelects) is due to be released?
Well, if you pull the source code, it's there. But I suspect it'll be
a few months before you start seeing pre-built binaries available.
There's
18 matches
Mail list logo