In the last episode (May 24), Michael Widenius said:
> - Message from "Joshua J. Kugler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Joshua> So, I can "SELECT id FROM table_name WHERE id IS NULL" as many times as I
> Joshua> need/want to, and it will return the proper value. Very nice.
>
> Joshua> So,
I understand you reasoning. If you don't change the official source code, I
can always make the change when I get a new version. Whatever you feel is
best.
But what scares me is a comment in the source code by the line I commented
out:
/*
** Handles this special case for some ODBC applicati
Hi!
- Message from "Joshua J. Kugler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Joshua> I've been arguing with MS Access lately. Fortunately, I won. But only
Joshua> because I had the source to MySQL available. Here's the situation:
Joshua> I grep'ed the source, and found this at line 3062 of sql/
Joshua J. Kugler writes:
> I've been arguing with MS Access lately. Fortunately, I won. But only
> because I had the source to MySQL available. Here's the situation:
>
> (If you're looking for the feature request, skip to the end of the e-mail.
> This message is a summary of a series of mes
I've been arguing with MS Access lately. Fortunately, I won. But only
because I had the source to MySQL available. Here's the situation:
(If you're looking for the feature request, skip to the end of the e-mail.
This message is a summary of a series of message posted on the MyODBC list.
I
