Thank you for valuable feedback!
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
__ ___ ___ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Egor Egorov
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_
At 02:04 AM 9/24/2004, Egor Egorov wrote:
Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > And we've had good but limited experiences so far with 64 bit FreeBSD
>> > 5 on amd64 (also a quad w/32GB).
>>
>> Somewhere in this list I've seen controversial reports about
FreeBSD/amd64.
>> Seems like it's
Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > And we've had good but limited experiences so far with 64 bit FreeBSD
>> > 5 on amd64 (also a quad w/32GB).
>>
>> Somewhere in this list I've seen controversial reports about FreeBSD/amd64.
>> Seems like it's not yet stable and may give unpredictable
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:01:53PM +0300, Egor Egorov wrote:
> Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a million times
> >> better than a quad xeon 3.06. The opteron can handle more than 3
> >> gigs of memory which is a 32 bit limitation.
Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a million times
>> better than a quad xeon 3.06. The opteron can handle more than 3
>> gigs of memory which is a 32 bit limitation. Right now in my quad
>> opteron we have 32 gigs of memory and MySQL is
"Dathan Vance Pattishall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get permission from my bosses to release the benchmarks I will send it =
> to the list.
Please! This definitely will be a valuable information for the community.
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=e
; From: Donny Simonton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:15 PM
> To: 'Brian Abbott'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'Miles Keaton'
> Subject: RE: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL now? Opteron?
> OpenBSD? SuSE?
>
>
iginal Message-
> From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:21 PM
> To: Donny Simonton
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Miles Keaton'
> Subject: Re: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL now? Opteron?
> OpenBSD? SuSE?
>
>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:31:54PM -0700, Brian Abbott wrote:
> Do you guys have metrics on this that you would be willing to share? We
> are looking at upgrading to the Opteron (from the Xeon) at the moment.
> Any information would be very helpful.
I don't have any yet but should in a week or tw
Also, out of curiosity, who was your vendor for the opteron?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:21 PM
To: Donny Simonton
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Miles Keaton'
Subject: Re: best-performing CPU + platform
14, 2004 2:21 PM
To: Donny Simonton
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Miles Keaton'
Subject: Re: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL now? Opteron?
OpenBSD? SuSE?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 03:05:07PM -0500, Donny Simonton wrote:
>
> I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a mill
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 03:05:07PM -0500, Donny Simonton wrote:
>
> I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a million times
> better than a quad xeon 3.06. The opteron can handle more than 3
> gigs of memory which is a 32 bit limitation. Right now in my quad
> opteron we have 32 gigs of m
, with the rpm built by MySQL. We don't run anything
else any longer.
Donny
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:11 PM
> To: Miles Keaton
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: best-performing C
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:48:37PM -0700, Miles Keaton wrote:
> If my company wants to get the best-performing fastest platform for a
> MySQL server, what would it be these days? Opteron? Dual? Quad?
>
> And on a related note...
>
> If a 64-bit CPU, then I'm assuming it would need an operating
If my company wants to get the best-performing fastest platform for a
MySQL server, what would it be these days? Opteron? Dual? Quad?
And on a related note...
If a 64-bit CPU, then I'm assuming it would need an operating system
designed for that 64-bit CPU, to get best performance, right?
I k
15 matches
Mail list logo
