Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-08 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:29:04AM +0307, Tonu Samuel wrote: > Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > > > >> Perhaps, but it's not listed here: > >> > >>http://www.mysql.com/doc/manual.php?search_query=handler&depth=0 > > > > > > I *think* that only searches the 3.23.xx docs. I just found the same > > t

Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-07 Thread Tonu Samuel
Jeremy Zawodny wrote: >> Perhaps, but it's not listed here: >> >> http://www.mysql.com/doc/manual.php?search_query=handler&depth=0 > > > I *think* that only searches the 3.23.xx docs. I just found the same > thing. :-( Sure. We do not want to confuse people with manual of incomplete and

Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-07 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Tim Bunce writes: > > Perhaps, but it's not listed here: > > http://www.mysql.com/doc/manual.php?search_query=handler&depth=0 > > Tim. > Apologies to you both, this has been done in 4.0 branch -- Regards, __ ___ ___ __ / |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Mr. Sinisa Miliv

Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-06 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 08:31:56PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > It is in the manual under this heading : > > > > `HANDLER' Syntax > > > > Perhaps, but it's not listed here: > > http://www.mysql.com/doc/manual.php?search_query=handler&depth=0 I *think* that only searche

Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-06 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 04:36:08PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: > Tim Bunce writes: > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:51:34PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: > > > > It may have been implemented 2 months ago (for v4.0), but it doesn't > > seem to be documented. > > > > Will is be documented so

Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-06 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 04:36:08PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: > Tim Bunce writes: > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:51:34PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: > > > > It may have been implemented 2 months ago (for v4.0), but it doesn't > > seem to be documented. > > > > Will is be documented so

Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-06 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Tim Bunce writes: > > It may have been implemented 2 months ago (for v4.0), but it doesn't > seem to be documented. > > Will is be documented soon? > > Tim. Forgot to mention that it is implemented on MyISAM, not ISAM tables. -- Regards, __ ___ ___ __ / |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/

Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-06 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Tim Bunce writes: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:51:34PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: > > It may have been implemented 2 months ago (for v4.0), but it doesn't > seem to be documented. > > Will is be documented soon? > > Tim. > It is in the manual under this heading : `HANDLER' Syntax

Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-06 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:51:34PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: > Volker Paepcke writes: > > Hi! > > > > One year ago Michael Widenius posted this: > > > > > > We have on the other hand played with the idea to at some point > > implement SQL commands of type: > > > > IS

Re: direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-06 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Volker Paepcke writes: > Hi! > > One year ago Michael Widenius posted this: > > > We have on the other hand played with the idea to at some point > implement SQL commands of type: > > ISAM INSERT table_name (...) > ISAM UPDATE table_name SET ... WHERE key_name=(key_part

direct ISAM access vs. SQL parser

2001-07-06 Thread Volker Paepcke
Hi! One year ago Michael Widenius posted this: We have on the other hand played with the idea to at some point implement SQL commands of type: ISAM INSERT table_name (...) ISAM UPDATE table_name SET ... WHERE key_name=(key_part1,key_part2,...); ISAM READ table_name