We are in the process of selecting a vendor for edge devices in an
upcoming deployment, and my direct experience with Foundry is
somewhat dated (1999-2000).
If you are using Foundry NetIron or BigIron series devices to aggregate a
significant number of EBGP peers in a production environment,
Is anybody aware of a vendor that can supply a layer three device with the
capability to pass 2000 or more simultaneous cRTP flows over ATM DS3 without
running out of CPU? Each flow is 12Kbit/sec (with RTP header compression).
Specifically I am talking about G729a traffic with a 30ms payload. C
Thanks to all who answered. I was looking for the named.root file for my
servers. It doesn't change very often, but it did change fairly recently,
enough to break a couple of lookups.
Curtis
Matt Zito said:
>
>
> The actual root zone is at:
>
> ftp://rs.internic.net/domain/
>
> But if you me
On 4/29/02 9:08 AM, "Beckmeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marshall et al,
>
> It's a lack of IP Address Space
Last I looked there was plenty of address space.
> - and the numbers I gave - 10's of
> thousands are probably a bit on the small side - in short order it will
> be multiples of 100
jb,
i've seen this as a part of turnkey solution by one of gprs vendors. they made two
service classes - generic (10.0.0.0/8-based with nat) and 'privileged' - with
registered addresses. and it was not only a slideware but a real installation
but then you have many other large-scale issues li
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:08:16 -0700
Beckmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Marshall et al,
>
Dear JB;
1.) Dare I suggest that you use IPv6 ? It should make a
great NAT.
2.) If you are interested in having content put on your
wireless devices I would like to talk off line.
Regards
Marshall
Marshall et al,
It's a lack of IP Address Space - and the numbers I gave - 10's of
thousands are probably a bit on the small side - in short order it will
be multiples of 100,000 IP addresses. To start with, I'm willing to
think in terms of 10's of thousands spread over a handful of "POPs".
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 08:43:11 -0700
Beckmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is anybody here doing NAT for their customers?
>
> I'm looking at a situation where I may have to provide
> NAPT for tens of
> thousands of users and am curious as to what hardware is
> being used, how
> well it scal
Is anybody here doing NAT for their customers?
I'm looking at a situation where I may have to provide NAPT for tens of
thousands of users and am curious as to what hardware is being used, how
well it scales, what kind of loads it takes such as:
throughput,
max simultaneous sessions experience
