Maybe I should have explained. All the domains I care about are at other
registrars.
My old NIC handle points to an email address that is dead. It is still
attached to a few domains I would like to takeover when they expire.
jas
$27 per year savings? Over $35? OpenSRS sells its resellers regs for $10,
not $8.
Are you saying you pay $8 and not $10 to OpenSRS for .com, .net, .org ? Or
that you pay $10 and only charge them $8?
At 05:28 PM 5/10/02 -0700, you wrote:
>
>On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:17:59AM +0200, Paul Woute
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:17:59AM +0200, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2002, Adam McKenna wrote:
>
> > They've begun making the templates harder and harder to find. I don't know
> > if this is on purpose (although I suspect it is).
>
> Ofcourse it is. Only ask the admin-c (clueless
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Adam McKenna wrote:
> They've begun making the templates harder and harder to find. I don't know
> if this is on purpose (although I suspect it is).
Ofcourse it is. Only ask the admin-c (clueless client) for approval to
transfer (not the tech-c, whose email address actuall
you can get to the contact information two ways:
first from the netsol.com site
goto netsol.com..then click the manage account tab..then click on the
contact manager link right below it(after the page loads)...then
continue onwards.
or you can just hit this link directly:
https://www.netsol.c
you can get to the contact information two ways:
first from the netsol.com site
goto netsol.com..then click the manage account tab..then click on the contact
manager link right below it(after the page loads)...then continue onwards.
or you can just hit this link directly:
https://www.netsol.com
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:16:25PM -0400, Jason Lewis wrote:
>
> I can't find info on network solutions website for changing info for my
> NIC handle? What is the deal?
> I figured I would send an empty messages to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get some info, but the email it send
> back is full of d
I can't find info on network solutions website for changing info for my
NIC handle? What is the deal?
I figured I would send an empty messages to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and get some info, but the email it send
back is full of dead links.
For the life of me, I can't find and info on where all the temp
Hi,
I have a strange question because this is not very common. Lets asume the following scenario to simplify it:
net A -- RTA --- RT1-ISP1 --- IP Cloud --- RT2-ISP1 -- RTB -- net b
--- RT1-ISP2 --- IP cloud --- RT2-ISP2 --
RTA and RTB are in differents ASs. ISP1 is preferred via BGP (local pre
GTE/Verizon has been doing this for quite some time now (almost a year
or two?). I cannot recall the last time I've received SPAM from a
GTE/Verizon Internet customer since this policy. I recall before this policy
was in place, we got quite a large amount of spam from *.gte.net.
Addition
MFN has a fiber cut in NYC. I don't know the extent of the outage, but I do
know that my connection from 60 hudson to bush terminal in brooklyn is out.
Hope it's not too bad.
GP
Hi all,
I have been traveling extensively recently and I eventually tired of
changing accounts/profiles/settings in Outlook. After having an eLink
account for 3+ years, I switched to AT&T Worldnet which allows me to use
different smtp servers by just requesting smtp pass through permission for
I heard they were being bought by Verio. Maybe Verio is taking over their
routes and dropping AS3491?
Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com
div. of Doncaster Consulting Inc.
On Fri, 10 May 2002, John Palmer wrote:
>
>
> Anyone see anything strange with AS 3491 today? They have been drop
Anyone see anything strange with AS 3491 today? They have been dropping our routes on
and off all day
long?
I was stuck in a dial-up-only hell for a few months and used quite a
bit of Earthlink dial-up. I during that time, I did a variety of
tinkering of the email headers (like masquerading envelopes). It sure
didn't seem to me that Earthlink cared at all what domain was in the
return path. Their SMTP
Here's a preliminary list of presentations scheduled for NANOG25 in
Toronto.
PS - be sure to register at the hotel before our lower-price block expires
on May 18:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0206/hotel.html
==
On Fri, 10 May 2002, David Charlap wrote:
>
> Jim Hickstein wrote:
> >
> > My customers who reach me (a mail service) from Earthlink dialups
> > are affected by this. Apparently it's still happening. I run a
> > listener on another host and port, known only to this (so far)
> > small subset
CL> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 18:29:23 +0100
CL> From: Chrisy Luke
[ snipped ]
CL> While nobody has tried to take a "Tier-1" to court for what
CL> could be taken as anti-competitive actions said providers
CL> will carry on - it's win-win for them. The marginal loss of
CL> connectivity to *your* n
Jim Hickstein wrote:
>
> One clarification: Can these users relay through that host, using
> SMTP AUTH, from anywhere, or only from within your network? I
> observe, for instance, that the instructions for Outlook 2000
> (Windows) does not have them check "my [outgoing SMTP] server
> requires a
Jim Hickstein wrote:
>
> My customers who reach me (a mail service) from Earthlink dialups
> are affected by this. Apparently it's still happening. I run a
> listener on another host and port, known only to this (so far)
> small subset of people, to be able to serve them. In general, we
> adv
James Smith wrote (on May 10):
> Maybe it is possible he made a business decision based on the long term
> costs involved with multihoming/redundancy vs. the loss of near total
> reachability. He may have come to the conclusion that the probability of
> that scenario occuring was not sufficient r
This is an Informational Message to the internet community:
VeriSign Global Registry Services will be changing the IP address for k.gtld-servers.net in the authoritative NS set for com/net/org. The change will be reflected in zone serial # 2002051001
The new set of servers authoritative fo
This is an Informational Message to the internet community:
VeriSign Global Registry Services will be changing the IP address for
k.gtld-servers.net in the authoritative NS set for com/net/org. The change
will be reflected in zone serial # 2002051001
The new set of servers authoritative for th
I'm interested to hear from those of you that might be using xacct, and your thoughts
on the product. To keep traffic down on the list, just reply to me.
If you are providing cable modem service and using xacct I'd really like to talk to
you.
For those of you that ask for a summary of the rep
>> And didn't some ugly peering battles between 701 and 3561 back
>> when 3561 was MCI cause some { severely hampered | loss of }
>> connectivity between the two?
When AS3561 started (registered in 1994, turned on in 1995),
it started with many of the old NSF regionals attached to it.
This in
JS> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:26:13 -0400
JS> From: James Smith
JS> > H maybe there should be a "list of peering
JS> > policies" site a la Jared's NOC page.
JS> Interesting idea. Include verifiable user comments as to what
JS> the policy actually is as exemplified by actual practice
JS
Title: RE: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios)
>-Original Message-
>From: E.B. Dreger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:13 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios)
>
>
>H maybe there should be a "list of
H maybe there should be a "list of peering policies" site
a la Jared's NOC page.
BTW, has anybody else tried calling the toll-free Sprint NOC
number listed on puck.nether.net? Is this a new alternative to
on-hold muzak? ;-)
(To prevent slashdotting said INWATS line without totally blow
JS> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:48:25 -0400
JS> From: James Smith
JS> I think we all assume that our provider "guarantees" us some
JS> sort of "total reachability". Near as I can figure, they do
JS> not. Therefore, you buy a pipe into their network based on
JS> percieved and actual connectivity a
Title: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios)
>>
>> I apologize in advance, I'm a total newbie...so what did you have to do?
>
>Build resilience into his single homed, single point of failure
>non-redundant network.
>
>Steve
>
=
Maybe it is pos
Jim,
Yes, SMTP settings will to have to be changed to match whatever service,
different from Earthlink.net, that you happen to use. As an outlook user, I
simply created multiple profiles which referred to the same local mail
store. This technique even works with the VPN to the corporate Exchan
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Michael Painter wrote:
>
> >>All of that changed when C&W depeered from PSI. I lost a lot of money
> due to Mr. Jansen's fascism.
>
> Understand now?<<
>
>
> I apologize in advance, I'm a total newbie...so what did you have to do?
Build resilience into his single homed
>>All of that changed when C&W depeered from PSI. I lost a lot of money
due to Mr. Jansen's fascism.
Understand now?<<
I apologize in advance, I'm a total newbie...so what did you have to do?
--Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Dean S Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTE
33 matches
Mail list logo
