On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 01:25 +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> I'd like these moderators to stand down from any elected position
> for a period of at least a year from the formation of the new
> permanent governance structure.
Paul makes very good solid points. One thing that I would add, having
expe
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> Merit has setup the nanog-futures list and made it public and open from the
> outset.. that is the forum to take this discussion to but focus on what
> you want not whats past or interim.
>
Okay I just double checked the archive before saying this b
> Paul Vixie wrote:
> I am uncomfortable having folks from the nanog-reform
> community accepting responsibility for provisional
> moderation (a form of interim governance),
So am I. However, I will point out that these individuals have acted
with precipitation (which is the correct term to use w
> William Allen Simpson wrote:
> And I especially like Paul's point that those serving as the
> moderators be disqualified from serving in another position
> for at least a year.
Ditto.
Michel.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> >... I just wish that all the political I's would get dotted and all the
> >political T's would get crossed. Perception isn't *actually* reality, but in
> >politics (which this is) the difference between perception and re
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Chances are that the Sendmail team doesn't share your worm problems as most
> of them are not likely running unpatched windows boxes.
You don't have to run Windowz systems to get hit by their blowback.
And that's the problem, in a nutshell
--
-- T
Paul Vixie wrote:
... I just wish that all the political I's would get
dotted and all the political T's would get crossed. Perception isn't
*actually* reality, but in politics (which this is) the difference
between perception and reality is just not worth discussing.
Speaking as someone with mo
I promised some people that I'd comment publically on the moderation change.
Selecting Steve's message at random as a place to start, let me just quote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Gibbard)
> Subject: Re: NANOG Changes
> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 01:04:51 -0800 (PST)
>
> Speaking only for myse
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 19 Feb, 2005
Anyone running into odd problems at Qwest lately.. One of our /22s is
getting dropped whenever it hits Qwest, but unfortunately Qwest is
announcing a BGP path for the /22.. so all Qwest routing for this /22 is
dead.. The subnet is 204.11.104.0/22 .. if someone at Qwest can resolve or
explain the
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:43:05 +, Alex Bligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On 18 February 2005 08:32 + Simon Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Whilst I can appreciate that Kornet may have issues with a lot of
> > broadband users, but the other big Korean company seems to have it
> >
Apparently, the fat lady ain't sung yet. :-)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32801-2005Feb17.html
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SBC, Verizon Say They Didn't Block Vonage
http://www.advancedippipeline.com/60401872
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This report has been generated at Fri Feb 18 21:44:32 2005 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
--On 18 February 2005 08:32 + Simon Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Whilst I can appreciate that Kornet may have issues with a lot of
broadband users, but the other big Korean company seems to have it
solved. What I see is what appear to be (using whois data!) US companies
buying transit f
On Thursday 17 Feb 2005 8:11 pm, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> Any chance of trying to get some granularity to this? As I understand
> their operation, there are enormous differences among the operations in
> different provinces.
220.175 550 ChinaNet Jiangxi not wanted here se
16 matches
Mail list logo
