Re: SORBS Identity theft alert

2005-04-10 Thread Bill Nash
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Dean Anderson wrote: See http://www.iadl.org/sorbs/sorbs-story.html And with some clever correlation, googling, and patience, I could do the same for the majority of people posting to this list on a regular basis. In short, what's your point? If you have substantial evidence

SORBS Identity theft alert

2005-04-10 Thread Dean Anderson
See http://www.iadl.org/sorbs/sorbs-story.html SORBS seems to be collecting a lot of sensitive information to view listings: Name: Preferred Login ID: Password: Confirm Password: Home Phone: Business Phone: Mobile Phone: Email Address: Company: Autonomous Systems Number: Security Question: Secu

Re: clued/interested LEO list

2005-04-10 Thread Hank Nussbacher
At 02:12 PM 10-04-05 -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote: What is different about this then your current botnet tracking lists? If its anti-spam & anti-phishing, there are several closed mail lists discussing preventetive measures and tracking down those responsible for abuse. Yes, us geeks have many

Re: The power of default configurations

2005-04-10 Thread Christopher L. Morrow
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > but that was five years ago. Have manufacturers *really* not made that > item a default by now? Have providers *really* not changed out that yes, they really haven't :( more people ought to reference RFC3871 in their RFP's and stop accepting sub-

Re: The power of default configurations

2005-04-10 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:15:39PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote: > How can we make more software "safe by default?" Because relying on the > user or sysadmin to make it safe isn't working. That includes safe > default configurations that are conservative in what they send, such as > doing RFC1918 l

Re: The power of default configurations

2005-04-10 Thread Sean Donelan
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > no to 1) prolong the pain, 2) beat a horsey.. BUT, why are 1918 ips > 'special' to any application? why are non-1918 ips 'special' in a > different way? Because they're 'special.' But you are correct, there is nothing special about RFC1918 at th

Re: clued/interested LEO list

2005-04-10 Thread william(at)elan.net
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Gadi Evron wrote: I'm creating a list of clued and/or interested LEO's, What is LEO stands for in your terminology? who would like to be part of CLOSED/PRIVATE/SECRET online communities such as anti-botnets, anti-spam, anti-phishing, etc. mailing lists, and/or get information

Re: clued/interested LEO list

2005-04-10 Thread Petri Helenius
Gadi Evron wrote: Petri Helenius wrote: joe mcguckin wrote: Isn't there already one 'secret handshake' club in existence already? Yes, but unlike there is a need for multiple instances of different governments, there is a need for multiple 'closed communities'. It will allow them to become corr

Re: clued/interested LEO list

2005-04-10 Thread Gadi Evron
Petri Helenius wrote: joe mcguckin wrote: Isn't there already one 'secret handshake' club in existence already? Yes, but unlike there is a need for multiple instances of different governments, there is a need for multiple 'closed communities'. It will allow them to become corrupt in different w

Re: clued/interested LEO list

2005-04-10 Thread Petri Helenius
joe mcguckin wrote: Isn't there already one 'secret handshake' club in existence already? Yes, but unlike there is a need for multiple instances of different governments, there is a need for multiple 'closed communities'. It will allow them to become corrupt in different ways. Pete On 4/10/05

Re: clued/interested LEO list

2005-04-10 Thread joe mcguckin
Isn't there already one 'secret handshake' club in existence already? On 4/10/05 3:45 AM, "Gadi Evron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm creating a list of clued and/or interested LEO's, who would like to > be part of CLOSED/PRIVATE/SECRET online communities such as > anti-botnets, anti-sp

Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND

2005-04-10 Thread Paul Vixie
> I need&&want rndc! personally, i liked ndc better. (but ndc was the last bind code i ever wrote, so perhaps i'm only pining for better days when i wrote code rather than just e-mail.) > > Using bind 8 and 9 but still looking for something better, > > Doing that too, we could as well just kil

(half OT) Tool for ASN statistic freaks: webalizer_asn

2005-04-10 Thread Fredy Kuenzler
Webalizer_ASN v1.2b is available since a while, and according to my tests rather stable now. The ASN Data for Webalizer_ASN is based on Netlantis backend BGP engine (someone asked recently about Netlantis). If you experience a rainy lazy sunday, this might be a tool to play with a bit and build

clued/interested LEO list

2005-04-10 Thread Gadi Evron
I'm creating a list of clued and/or interested LEO's, who would like to be part of CLOSED/PRIVATE/SECRET online communities such as anti-botnets, anti-spam, anti-phishing, etc. mailing lists, and/or get information in their area of responsibility. I feel such a resource has been needed for a lon