I'm looking for a NOC or Security contact for storm.ca in Canada. One of
their customer's appears to have an infected/exploited system, however the
contact email addresses for their domain do not appear to be valid.
Thanks in advance.
Charlie
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:27:20 +0100, Magnus Eriksson wrote
> Will it help to throw a bigger box at the problem?
Would help to know what box you're using if you want to know whether a larger
box would help.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 02:07 PM 3/1/2003 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>People speed, drive drunk, and run over pedestrians. Should we outlaw
>cars? Maybe just in California? :)
To use your analogy, you'd have to outlaw computers because they're used to
bad things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 01:41 PM 3/1/2003 -0500, Michael Lamoureux wrote:
> andy> In this case, your door being unlocked cannot cause me
>andy> harm. However, an "unlocked proxy" can.
>
>Heh, so I guess you could make it his gun and the safety. Does that
>change your a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 04:54 PM 2/28/2003 -0500, Andy Dills wrote:
>You don't have to. This is why I never understood why people care so much
>about probing. If you do a good job with your network, probing will have
>zero affect on you. All the person probing can do (re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 03:52 PM 2/28/2003 -0500, Andy Dills wrote:
>Why is probing networks wrong?
Depends on why you're doing the probing.
If you're randomly walk up to my house and check to see if the door is
unlocked, you better be ready for a reaction. Same thing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 01:24 AM 2/17/2003 -0600, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>Unfortunately, IOS can introduce jitter when encrypting packets. To
>mitigate this, you can apply QOS, with a strict priotiy queue for the VoIP
>packets and the "qos pre-classify" feature. Your mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you check their main web site (bbnow.com), they don't mention
anything
about a failure or issues with service, but I did note that they have
disabled the "news" links. Not sure if there's a reason for that or
not ...
At 02:17 AM 1/25/2003 -0800,