mean
you can come in just because jack lives there
> This is no different from me authorizing Mail Boxes Etc to be my
> proxy for UPS packages, and them being allowed to simply discard
It is very different because you hold a physical package or something
for someone you are paid by
Last time I saw someone so strenously crying that 'thou must accept
mail' and trying so hard to justify why we should accept it was a low
life toss pot scum sucking spammer, ooops I mean direct marketer, ahh
stuf fit, both the same thing ...not implying anything here but if
the shoe fits
spam and virus's they want :)
that of course will never interfere with 99. reptv % of
customers *dont* want.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
System Administrator
Internet Services
L.C.P No. 251002 http://counter.li.org
---
Thi
There is one very key point to make in this,
use of *any* RBL is up to individual networks, no one makes anyone use
them, and those that do must know and accept all risks involved when
dealing with DUL's, SORBS operates a zone 'just for vernom' as well,
just like spamcop and njabl and others, but
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 06:49, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> We were hit by the requirement to include the word "static" in our DNS
> names to satisfy requirements. It wasn't enough to just say "this /17 is
> only static IPs, one customer, one IP, no dhcp or other dynamics at all),
> we actuall
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 07:39, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> That (blocking SMTP) could become illegal is some proposed "net
> neutrality" legislation is passed.
>
hahaha try enforcing that in other countries
also, most networks are private (not state run) therefore we have the
right to say yes/no what d
Hi All,
As I recall the no end of problems many of us had when APNIC issued
124/7, I'll get in early and ask that you please be advised of the
following and make any required changes to your core equipment.
Thanks..
-Forwarded Message-
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: APNIC debogon proj
Dear colleagues,
This is a resend of APNIC message issued Feb this year, many of you
have not removed the filters creating problems for many networks in
Australia and other APNIC covered countries, as the below mentioned
'near future' has been well underway for some couple of months.
It would b
Hi Rob,
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 06:14, Rob Thomas wrote:
> You could Zebra peer with the Bogon route-servers and accept
> these prefixes as null routes. I've used null routes on servers
> frequently, but I've not tried the combination before. Take it
> with a grain of salt. :)
>
This works
On-List replies perhaps may be usefull.. Or could you post a summary of
your findings?
Regards,
Noel Montales
Claydon, Tom said:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are moving from a Cisco 7206 to a 7513, and I was wondering if we
> will be limited by bandwidth points on the 7513 (as we are
o.
I can't be the only one tired of manually manipulating BGP. I can't be the
only one that can't afford something commercially to do this!
-Noel
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Vixie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26,
Hello!
Does anybody happen to know of any open source project working on a BGP
route optimizer like what Route Science or Internap or the likes have
commercially?
Just sounds like the sort of thing somebody would have though of, but I've
never seen any mention of it..
Regards,
Noel Mon
12 matches
Mail list logo
