ver IP
packets goes a long way to overcome blackhole situations where one could end up
sending tunneled packets to a PE which isn't able to receive and process them
correctly.
Thanks,
- Mark
Regards,
-- Enke
* From: W. Mark Townsley
* Date: Mon Mar
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
No, I was *not* referring to draft-raggarwa-ppvpn-tunnel-encap-sig-03.txt.
Redback's implementation that does not require manual provisioning of
point-to-point GRE tunnels between MPLS networks and to each and every
IP-only reachable PE is *purely* an implementation matter
Please see inline.
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Mark,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt
See also Mark's
David Meyer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Dave,
Hey Suki,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
Hello,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TD
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:08:08AM -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> >
> > For those saying Cisco is so great, it's still fucked up pretty bad. IOS
> > 12.1 and later doesn't allow an MTU > 1460 on L2TP, while 12.0.7(T) works
> > fine with a 1492 MTU that my PPPo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 17:54:44 EDT, Steve Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Gosh, oh golly-gee, do you really think that they would do something
> > like that (planting a story)?
>
> Well, officially, we've decided that we don't do disinformation:
>
> http://
