first.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Doncaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22. mája 2002 16:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Cisco 7200 VXR with NPE-400 (was RE: The market
> must be coming back)
>
>
>
>
> Based on our testing it looks like it all has to do with packet size. With
> small packets the throughput is very low. With what Cisco calls an
> "internet mix" of packet sizes throughput is much better. When doing max
> MTU packets, the throughput is of course the best.
The other thing I
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 AM
To: Adam Rothschild
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco 7200 VXR with NPE-400 (was RE: The market must be coming
back)
Adam:
> [...] Sort of like buying a GbE interface for a 7200 (It only get's
> > 10% throughput... Why wast
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 04:55:51PM +0900, Gary wrote:
> Richard:
>
> > And if^H^Hwhen you run into a really fun issue, don't even think
> > about calling Foundry TAC after hours, all you'll get is someone's house
> > with their screaming kids in the background.
>
> Our TAC is 24/7 and has been
On 2002-05-21-01:12:25, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used a Cisco 7200 VXR with NPE-400. I used two different 7200's
> with the exact same results. Bidirectional throughput on 1GbE is a
> fraction above 10%. Unidirectional is a bit better (23%). Singl
> line ACL drops it to 8% (permit
Richard:
> And if^H^Hwhen you run into a really fun issue, don't even think
> about calling Foundry TAC after hours, all you'll get is someone's house
> with their screaming kids in the background.
Our TAC is 24/7 and has been 24/7 for years. I work in the Support Center
for Japan. We have no
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 07:27:35AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> I have personally seen a 7200 with PXF-chip and two PA-GE do NAT at
> 300megabit with a few (10-15) ftp streams going thru it. With more random
> load it wouldn't go much above 100 meg, though.
I have done 400Mbit with an N
Adam:
> [...] Sort of like buying a GbE interface for a 7200 (It only get's
> > 10% throughput... Why waste the money, just buy FE!).
>
> How did the Foundry test lab arrive at those figures, and what
> substances were consumed at the time?
I used a Cisco 7200 VXR with NPE-400. I used two dif
