OpenNMS is ok, depending on your needs. At the level we've needed it to
scale, it's failed miserably. We've also had reliability issues with
it, but some are associated with it's scaling issues.
Tom
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 12:16:28PM -0400, Gary T. Giesen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 12:16:28PM -0400, Gary T. Giesen wrote:
>
> I'm looking at depolying an open source-based NMS solution, and I'm
> looking at a couple products, mostly OpenNMS (http://www.opennms.org)
> and Zenoss (http://www.zenoss.org). I like the looks of Zenoss, but
> I've never really
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 12:16:28PM -0400, Gary T. Giesen wrote:
> I'm looking at depolying an open source-based NMS solution, and I'm
Define what you want in your "NMS" -- not even the vendors can manage to
agree on a meaning.
> looking at a couple products, mostly OpenNMS (http://www.opennms.org
I'm looking at depolying an open source-based NMS solution, and I'm
looking at a couple products, mostly OpenNMS (http://www.opennms.org)
and Zenoss (http://www.zenoss.org). I like the looks of Zenoss, but
I've never really heard of it and I'm wondering if anyone has any
experiences with it that
