- Original Message -
From: "Farrell,Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David Hubbard"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sam Stickland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, Jan
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry BigIron to Cisco 2950T
> You are using a crossover cable right?
>> I'm having a right mare trying to get a Foundry BigIron to
>> connect up to a cisco 2950T, via Gigabit copper.
i was under the impression that gige sp
> You are using a crossover cable right?
>> I'm having a right mare trying to get a Foundry BigIron to
>> connect up to a cisco 2950T, via Gigabit copper.
i was under the impression that gige spec handled crossover
automagically
randy
Hi,
Yup, it's definately a cross-over cable. ;) I had already tried this
suggestion but the cisco 2950T doesn't appear to have the "no nego auto"
command :/
(config)#int Gi0/2
(config-if)#no n?
% Unrecognized command
(config-if)#no n
(config-if)#no neg auto
^
% Invalid input d
You are using a crossover cable right? If that's all set, you
do need to have neg-off on the Foundry and "no nego auto" on the
Cisco. I haven't used the rj-45 gbics in the Foundry equipment
before, not sure if that could be an issue. I would go with
the hard set 1000-full on both sides.
David
Hi,
I'm having a right mare trying to get a Foundry BigIron to connect up to a
cisco 2950T, via Gigabit copper.
The Foundry BigIron is using a cisco RJ45/copper GBIC that was pulled from
a live cisco 6500, where it was working fine. The cisco 2950T has two
fixed 10/100/1000 RJ45 ports.
Th
BTW, our Sprint DS3 came back up about 15 minutes ago.
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO +1-775-348-7299
Great Basin Internet Services, Inc.company-wide fax: +1-775-348-9412
http://www.greatbasin.net my efax: +1-775-201-1553
Olsen, Jason wrote
> Got confirmation from my Sprint service manager that there's
> a fairly major cut. I quote,
>
> "Currently, Sprint has been impacted by a major network
> event (fiber cut) on the West Coast. This fiber cut has
> impacted both data and voice services. I will provide updates
> ASAP..
> "Currently, Sprint has been impacted by a major network event
> (fiber cut) on the West Coast.
west coast would not seem to include seattle, as far as i can
tell from an stm1 in the westin.
randy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Erik Amundson
> Mud slides? Fiber cuts? What the heck? All my west-coast lines went
splat a while ago...
Got confirmation from my Sprint service manager that there's a fairly
major cut. I quote,
"Currently, Sprint has b
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:12:47PM -0800, Crist Clark wrote:
>
> Having trouble getting anything out of our Sprint rep. Rumors of
> fiber whack. Problems out here in San Jose, California and in Texas,
> Waco vicinity. Hard to say whether some of our problems over the rest
> of No
There is a confirmed Sprint outage.. For those that care or have tried
calling Sprint due to phone problems as well...
master ticket # 7922107
Tom Sands wrote:
We've also seen and heard of problems with Sprint in TX. Nothing that
Sprint has confirmed though.
Crist Clark
: Re: Sprint Problems?
Were seeing issues with Sprint over to the Westcoast. Informal report is
a fiber cut in Northern CA.
There is almost certainly a Sprint fiber cut, probably somewhere in the
Feather River canyon in Northern California. The canyon was hit pretty
hard during the rains of a couple weeks ago, and so I suspect that
we're experiencing backhoe fade.
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO
>>> Joe Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/9/06 2:29:29 PM >>>
>
>
>Were seeing issues with Sprint over to the Westcoast. Informal report
is
>a fiber cut in Northern CA.
>
>
I don't know if it's related but we also lost a point-to-point circuit
from Denver to CA at 13:19 Mountain time. A portion of
Were seeing issues with Sprint over to the Westcoast. Informal report is
a fiber cut in Northern CA.
We've also seen and heard of problems with Sprint in TX. Nothing that
Sprint has confirmed though.
Crist Clark wrote:
Having trouble getting anything out of our Sprint rep. Rumors of
fiber whack. Problems out here in San Jose, California and in Texas,
Waco vicinity. Hard to say wh
Crist Clark wrote:
Having trouble getting anything out of our Sprint rep. Rumors of
fiber whack. Problems out here in San Jose, California and in Texas,
Waco vicinity. Hard to say whether some of our problems over the rest
of North America are related to Texas and California or more
Seeing increased latency on the west coast but haven't yet examined it
closely.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:12:47PM -0800, Crist Clark wrote:
>
> Having trouble getting anything out of our Sprint rep. Rumors of
> fiber whack. Problems out here in San Jose, California and in
Having trouble getting anything out of our Sprint rep. Rumors of
fiber whack. Problems out here in San Jose, California and in Texas,
Waco vicinity. Hard to say whether some of our problems over the rest
of North America are related to Texas and California or more widespread.
Voice and data
Hello Folks,
Is it just us, or are others experiencing loss/latency/bgp flapping
within Cogent (AS174) network in Miami? I'm not a direct customer; my
upstream is working with them, and was wondering. This appears to have
started for us 10/29/05 19:40 EDT.
Thanks,
Chris Ranch
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Gary Hale wrote:
Hmmm ... I suppose I would prefer this community not be made an
explicit source of information for a reporter. Implicitly, if
reporters must hang off this thread, they should be able to
discern impact from perspective given here. However, if questi
: Monday, October 24, 2005 9:57 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Level3 problems
> Hmmm ... I suppose I would prefer this community not be made an
explicit
> source of information for a reporter.
You're about 10 years too late. Reporters have been lurking
on the NANOG list for at l
> Hmmm ... I suppose I would prefer this community not be made an explicit
> source of information for a reporter.
You're about 10 years too late. Reporters have been lurking
on the NANOG list for at least that long. Only the newbie
reporters post info requests to the lists. The pros send
privat
iginal Message-
From: Alex Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 1:43 PM
To: Gary Hale
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Level3 problems
Gary,
I understand your statement, but I am sure the gentleman below does not.
If you want a story to be d
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 01:30:05PM -0600, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
>
> Authoritative sources report that Verio coincidentally had major problems
> last night also:
>
> http://www.boingboing.net/2005/10/21/two_tierone_isps_are.html
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete Kruckenberg) writes:
> Authoritative sources report that Verio coincidentally had major problems
> last night also:
we (isc) saw level(3) go away and come back. verio's been normal here though.
--
Paul Vixie
Authoritative sources report that Verio coincidentally had major problems
last night also:
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/10/21/two_tierone_isps_are.html
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/21/0958232
("is this the end for Level3?" heh)
Odd.
The last time there was major i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 11:03 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Level3 problems
I'm a reporter with InformationWeek magazine. I'm trying to get an idea
of the
significance of this morning's outage. Has Level 3 communicated with you
about
the cause of the outa
This is a notification we just received regarding Level 3:
Level 3 has resolved their internal issues. They were having some
internal OSPF issues, but are going to send out an official RFO sometime
this morning. For now Internap is turning up each BGP session with Level
3 out of the PNAPs and
Are you kidding?
-gh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 11:03 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Level3 problems
I'm a reporter with InformationWeek magazine. I'm trying to get
I'm a reporter with InformationWeek magazine. I'm trying to get an idea of the
significance of this morning's outage. Has Level 3 communicated with you about
the cause of the outage? How greatly did the outage affect you or your
customers? Was this an unusually large event?
Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:18:43 -0700
"Sean Crandall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Emilian Ursu wrote:
> > >
> > > I see its completely down and several others are starting
> > > to have problems.
&
problems
PAIX, (Palo Alto, CA) -- service back online...
Tustin, (Orange County, CA) -- service back online
North Las Vegas -- service back online
-Vikas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 1:45 AM
To: Marco
Matarazzo
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Level3 problems
Marco Matarazzo wrote:
> On 10/21/05, David Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>Anyone get anything useful out of L3 yet?
>>
>
>
> In Italy service has been restored at 9.39 CET, or at least
Marco Matarazzo wrote:
On 10/21/05, David Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone get anything useful out of L3 yet?
In Italy service has been restored at 9.39 CET, or at least my BGP sessions
came up at that time. Traffic is flowing fine, I can reach USA and all other
locations with no
inston Wolf, I solve problems.
Friday, October 21, 2005 1:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Level3 problems
Anyone get anything useful out of L3 yet?
Dave
From: John van Oppen (list account) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am getting fast busy signals on all my Washington based
> level3 DID numbers at the mo
Still voice greeting... "Level(3) is experiencing a wide spread network
instability"
-Vikas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Hubbard
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 1:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Level
> not so good (thankfully that was not on my network).
>
>
> John :)
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: David Hubbard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Thursday, October 20, 2005 11:54 PM
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: RE: Level3 problems
&
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Emilian Ursu wrote:
> >
> > I see its completely down and several others are starting
> > to have problems.
> > Anyone knows whats up ?
>
> They're giving out master ticket #'s of 1429209 1429184 and 1429189
> I see its completely down and several others are starting> > > to have problems.
> > > Anyone knows whats up ?
It seems the problem is worldwide. Here in Italy I lost both BGP
sessions (primary and backup) at 7.51 CET, I can't even ping their
router anymore. And still
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:28:23AM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Emilian Ursu wrote:
> > >
> > > I see its completely down and several others
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Emilian Ursu wrote:
>
> I see its completely down and several others are starting
> to have problems.
> Anyone knows whats up ?
They're giving out master ticket #'s of 1429209 1429184 and 1429189
depending on who you talk to appa
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:28:23AM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Emilian Ursu wrote:
> >
> > I see its completely down and several others are starting
> > to have problems.
> > Anyone knows whats up ?
>
> I
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Emilian Ursu wrote:
>
> I see its completely down and several others are starting
> to have problems.
> Anyone knows whats up ?
I think everyone sees them completely down across the board (even mpls
transport services), been that way for a
I see its completely down and several others are starting
to have problems.
Anyone knows whats up ?
Thanks
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:38:14PM -0400, liz fazekas wrote:
> hey y'all:
> Good desktop staple:
> http://loadrunner.uits.iu.edu/weathermaps/abilene/abilene.html
Don't know if I would go that far, seeing as there is no useful content
there. Honestly, the sooner that I2 folks realize that they
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 07:37:15AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
>
> I am having problems with people connecting from the
> East Coast to my AS 17021 via qwest AS 209 on the West
> Coast. How do I troubleshoot this?
Big fiber cut in Radium Colorado at around 6:30 UTC, affec
e:
I am having problems with people connecting from the
East Coast to my AS 17021 via qwest AS 209 on the West
Coast. How do I troubleshoot this?
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
Matthew S. Crocker
Vice Pr
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 07:37:15AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
>
> I am having problems with people connecting from the
> East Coast to my AS 17021 via qwest AS 209 on the West
> Coast. How do I troubleshoot this?
I would suggest to check up on a view route-servers, do some
trac
I am having problems with people connecting from the
East Coast to my AS 17021 via qwest AS 209 on the West
Coast. How do I troubleshoot this?
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
e subject of technical jokes on NANOG appalling.
Not jokes, my dear Mr. Baptista, what we've been saying is "We told you so"
in about 200 different forms. Chaos is not unexpected from an alternate
root system, though we more expected the problems to start with technical
barriers, b
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Peter Dambier wrote:
> Statement of the Official Public-Root Representative
> Public-Root resolution problems
>
> I in my capacity as the Official Public-Root Representative and
> whistle-blower, asked Peter Dambier to publish to NANOG a notice that the
&g
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 04:05:34PM +0100,
Andy Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 19 lines which said:
> A bit like an internationally organized, non-profit corporation
...
> Has anyone considered this ?
Yes, replacing the DoC puppet by an internationally organized
corporation w
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Peter Dambier wrote:
> Statement of the Official Public-Root Representative
> Public-Root resolution problems
>
> I in my capacity as the Official Public-Root Representative and
> whistle-blower, asked Peter Dambier to publish to NANOG a notice that the
&g
Peter Dambier wrote:
The Ankara root injected a number of older records into the DNS resulting
in false answers to queries. Ankara was also listing as root servers some
DNS that pointed back to ICANN data and did not resolve the Public-Root.
This was very unprofessional behavior on behalf of UNI
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:57:47 +0200, Peter Dambier said:
> http://www.cynikal.net/~baptista/P-R/2005-09-29%20Memo%20to%20the%20Internet%
20Community.pdf
> There was an attempt by UNIDT to start a new root system called the
> United-Root. Attempts by Ankara to test this root on l.public-root.net at
Statement of the Official Public-Root Representative
September 29, 2005
This communication is published on the Internet at URL:
http://www.cynikal.net/~baptista/P-R/2005-09-29%20Memo%20to%20the%20Internet%20Community.pdf
Memo to the Internet Community
Public-Root resolution problems
I in my
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:39:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Manish Karir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: 12/8 problems?
I'm sorry I'm a bit late on this thread but wanted to point out that you can
view some of the relevan
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 06:15:38AM -0700, Eric Louie wrote:
>
> FYI, happened again this morning for (at least) 12/8
> duration approx 30 minutes
> starting at 5:45 AM PDT.
Notice that AT&T is no longer taking chances, and is announcing 2 /9s.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FYI, happened again this morning for (at least) 12/8
duration approx 30 minutes
starting at 5:45 AM PDT.
Drew Linsalata wrote:
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
$10 says someone forgot "ip classless".
Is there a valid argument for making "ip classless" the default in the
IOS? Seems to me that it would only solve problems, but I don't
profess to be a routing guru, es
"Israel, David B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, my practical solution to this one is max-prefixing your peers.
> It means you have to watch your peers slow growth, but frankly, you
> should be watching that anyway.
Max-prefix is part of the battle.
A corollary "max-aggregate" where
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Israel, David B. wrote:
Richard A Steenbergen wrote on Friday, September 09, 2005 11:57 AM:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:44:05AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote:
Looks like 26210 is originating the prefixes and Telefonica is
happily
passing them along to the world, at leas
>12.0.0.0/8
>64.0.0.0/8
>65.0.0.0/8
And wouldn't you know it, we have an application that needs to reach
servers in 12/8 and 65/8, and someone just came over to me asking for
help in figuring out why that application isn't working. I guess I
should have checked my NANOG mail before I told them I
Richard A Steenbergen wrote on Friday, September 09, 2005 11:57 AM:
>On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:44:05AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote:
>>
>> Looks like 26210 is originating the prefixes and Telefonica is
happily
>> passing them along to the world, at least some portion of which is
glad
>> to g
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
$10 says someone forgot "ip classless".
Is there a valid argument for making "ip classless" the default in the
IOS? Seems to me that it would only solve problems, but I don't profess
to be a routing guru, especially in comparis
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:44:05AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote:
>
> Looks like 26210 is originating the prefixes and Telefonica is happily
> passing them along to the world, at least some portion of which is glad
> to go along for the ride.
>
> Q. How does the Internet work?
> A. Spit and glue
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Looks like 12956 is announcing some /8s to every peer and transit. Worse
still, Sprint and GX are propagating it. This is not the first time that
Telefonica has leaked a lot of garbage routes with serious network impact
as a result (nor is it the second or third,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:25:25AM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> Looks like 12956 is announcing some /8s to every peer and transit. Worse
> still, Sprint and GX are propagating it. This is not the first time that
> Telefonica has leaked a lot of garbage routes with serious network imp
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:12:25AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote:
Apologies for a post of an operational nature, but is anyone else seeing
problems with AT&Ts 12/8 block?
From a New York router connected to Global Crossing and Peer 1:
bo
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:12:25AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote:
>
> Apologies for a post of an operational nature, but is anyone else seeing
> problems with AT&Ts 12/8 block?
>
> From a New York router connected to Global Crossing and Peer 1:
>
> border-1.nycmny&
Apologies for a post of an operational nature, but is anyone else seeing
problems with AT&Ts 12/8 block?
From a New York router connected to Global Crossing and Peer 1:
border-1.nycmny> sh ip bgp 12.xxx.xxx.xxx
BGP routing table entry for 12.0.0.0/8, version 86901457
Paths: (2 av
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave Crocker writes:
>
>
>(By the way, I am awestruck at the potential impact of changing SNMP from
>UDP-based to TCP-based, given the extensive debates that took place about this
>when SNMP was originally developed. Has THIS decision been subject to
>adequate
Daniel,
All solutions will use a different SSH port as part of the standard just
so that firewall administrators have the ability to block.
Eliot
Daniel Senie wrote:
> At 02:00 PM 9/6/2005, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>
>> Eliot,
>>
>>> I need your help to correct for an impending mistake by the I
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:47:30PM -0400, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
> > The donations page is Akamaized, and the certificate says
> > "a248.e.akamai.net" instead of "www.redcross.org".
> >
> > I have the certificate signature available off-line.
>
> Which part of the transaction does this occur at
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Jay R. Ashworth
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 3:12 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Ops: redcross.org certificate problems with Akamai
>
>
>
> The donati
The donations page is Akamaized, and the certificate says
"a248.e.akamai.net" instead of "www.redcross.org".
I have the certificate signature available off-line.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:16:01PM -0600, Mike Lewinski wrote:
We have been told they are currently experiencing a major outage and
"All calls are failing out-going" (which isn't true as I've made some
calls, but am seeing intermittent congestion returned on our PRIs)
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:16:01PM -0600, Mike Lewinski wrote:
> We have been told they are currently experiencing a major outage and
> "All calls are failing out-going" (which isn't true as I've made some
> calls, but am seeing intermittent congestion returned on our PRIs)
>
> I have also heard
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:46:57PM -0500, Nick Thompson wrote:
> We are currently having outbound long distance issues via Qwest right
> now.
> A PSTN status page would be rather convenient at this moment.
Most telecom providers don't *have* status pages, for the same reason
that most telecom pro
Their VoIP LD service is also affected.. from my initial understanding
it affects a variety of inter-lata calls. Some inter-lata calls are down
hard.. others are intermittent. This holds true for calls between latas
where qwest is the ILEC. Ex: denver to somewhere in omaha (another qwest
number
Behalf Of
Mike Lewinski
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 4:16 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Qwest PSTN problems / status page?
Is anyone aware of a network status page for Qwest PSTN.
We have been told they are currently experiencing a major outage and
"All calls are failing out-going&qu
Is anyone aware of a network status page for Qwest PSTN.
We have been told they are currently experiencing a major outage and
"All calls are failing out-going" (which isn't true as I've made some
calls, but am seeing intermittent congestion returned on our PRIs)
I have also heard that it... "See
This issue is resolved.
Thanks to all who responsed on and off list.
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Rich Emmings wrote:
Anyone else (Wiltel customers especially) running into an operational issue
around D.C. with partial connectivity
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>
> Would this be affecting MIT, too?
>
> I've been noticing some very odd connectivity issues
> between here (Austin) and the CSAIL at MIT
>
I sent rick a note earlier ( 3 mins earlier) but...
3 0.so-5-3-3.XL2.DCA6.ALTER.NET (152.63.36.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:41:56PM -0400, Rich Emmings wrote:
>
> Anyone else (Wiltel customers especially) running into an operational issue
> around D.C. with partial connectivity
>
> It would seem MCI and Wiltel around D.C. have a 'informal' peering
> relationship and it's been errored righ
Would this be affecting MIT, too?
I've been noticing some very odd connectivity issues
between here (Austin) and the CSAIL at MIT
- ferg
-- Rich Emmings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone else (Wiltel customers especially) running into an operational issue
around D.C. with partial connec
Anyone else (Wiltel customers especially) running into an operational issue
around D.C. with partial connectivity
It would seem MCI and Wiltel around D.C. have a 'informal' peering
relationship and it's been errored right now for about 39 hours with a
half-duplex route announcement. This ha
97.53) asymm 10
51.997ms
15: no reply
16: no reply
17: no reply
18: no reply
O.o
Tim Rainier
Larry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/03/2005 02:19 PM
To
"Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, nanog@merit.edu
cc
Subject
Re: Probl
Richard,
You're not lying when you say the resolvers are spitting out different
results every minute, now the Cox uplink here goes from Dallas to San
Jose to and endpoint in Tokyo.
*Insert obligatory Microsoft expletive here*
JWP
On 8/3/05, Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On
> From a cable modem in Seattle behind broadwing, it is going to this,
> behind SBC in southern California:
>
> 1662 ms 61ms 50 ms
> Savvis-CDN-IAF1075825.cust-rtr.pacbell.net [69.108.147.58]
>
> Makes you wonder if they'll be switching back to Akamai soon. :)
>
>From Southern C
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:01:59PM -0500, Justin W. Pauler wrote:
>
> New Zeland and Australia? Me thinks someone goofed. And what's really
> strange is that Monday I ran this exact same traceroute for
> informational purposes and at or around hop #7 - cox dallas handed off
> to atlanta who hande
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 12:32, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
> Completely unrelated, but apparently Vonage is also
> having some problems this morning:
>
> http://gigaom.com/2005/08/03/massive-vonage-outage/
>
> - ferg
>
>
> -- Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROT
ional purposes and at or around hop #7 - cox dallas handed off
to atlanta who handed off to msn.net directly.
Odd.
JWP
On 8/3/05, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Completely unrelated, but apparently Vonage is also
> having some problems this morning:
>
>
Completely unrelated, but apparently Vonage is also
having some problems this morning:
http://gigaom.com/2005/08/03/massive-vonage-outage/
- ferg
-- Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:44:40AM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hi there,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:44:40AM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hi there, we've had a few complaints about connectivity
> issues to Microsoft, is anyone else seeing a problem? Usually I get
> between 2-3MBps when I download from them, at the moment I get 8k/sec
> downloading
> http://do
I started noticing this exact behavior yesterday afternoon, normally I
am able to pull things from microsoft.com at 500-900KB/s, but I'm down
in the 50-100KB range now.
I've run some traceroutes from my Cox uplink (which appears to be
peering with Microsoft), and nothing seems out of place or 'od
Perhaps they were /.-ed (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?
sid=05/08/03/0016223&tid=109&tid=189&tid=1) ?!? ;) ... sorry,
couldn't refrain ...
On a more serious note: do you really mean 2-3 MB(ytes)ps, or 2-3 Mb
(its)ps? In any case - FYI - I am getting right now, with the link
you indicated
201 - 300 of 960 matches
Mail list logo
