r specific
implementation.
Thanks all
- Original Message
From: Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; snort bsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu; juniper-nsp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 12:36:55 PM
Subject: RE: I
ge-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
Nordmark
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:44 PM
To: snort bsd
Cc: nanog@merit.edu; juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: IPv6 questions
snort bsd wrote:
> Never mind
>
> it is the VLAN number. But which RFC define this?
I've
snort bsd wrote:
Never mind
it is the VLAN number. But which RFC define this?
I've never seen an IPv6 RFC specify to put the VLAN number in the
link-local address.
Thus this must be an (odd) choice made by some implementation. Perhaps
the implementation somehow requires that all the link-l
Never mind
it is the VLAN number. But which RFC define this?
Thanks all
Dave
- Original Message
From: snort bsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nanog@merit.edu; juniper-nsp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 28 January, 2008 3:05:59 PM
Subject: IPv6 questions
Hi All:
With link-local IPv6 a
