On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 15:20 -0700, chuck goolsbee wrote:
> >Or say, lots of processing somewhere short term - like video
> >editing/rendering/whatever at the Olympic games.
>
> Rendering maybe, but editing needs human space...
Not even rendering... streaming it back to your established producti
Or say, lots of processing somewhere short term - like video
editing/rendering/whatever at the Olympic games.
Rendering maybe, but editing needs human space...
http://www.confidencebay.com
--chuck
ne.
I hope to do so through this thread.
Lorell
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lorell Hathcock
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 6:07 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center
That's the issue with thes
>On 15/10/2007, at 12:05 AM, Simon Lyall wrote:
> As for where the Blackboxes will be used, It'll be where companies
>> want
>> servers in place in weeks or months and existing datacenters are
>> full or
>> in the wrong place. Think of a building full of people processing
>> insurance claims
On 15/10/2007, at 12:05 AM, Simon Lyall wrote:
As for where the Blackboxes will be used, It'll be where companies
want
servers in place in weeks or months and existing datacenters are
full or
in the wrong place. Think of a building full of people processing
insurance claims in India or a clu
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Andy Davidson wrote:
> I understand what Lorell means - the web 2.0 scaling model is to
> throw resources, rather than intelligence at your bottlenecks.
I think this is a little hard. Just about all the Web 2.0 presentations I
see have a big bit that says that how they had to
On 14 Oct 2007, at 01:26, Jim Popovitch wrote:
- New Media / Web 2.0
HUH?
I understand what Lorell means - the web 2.0 scaling model is to
throw resources, rather than intelligence at your bottlenecks.
I met some 'web 2' people at a conference quite recently, and they
were telli
Poor word choice on my part regarding command center versus data
service augmentation.
However there are many capabilities that this setup can bring to bear
no differently than a military TOC is established out in a forward
operating site.
I do agree that a good DR plan and hot/warm sit
Jerry Dixon wrote:
> We've looked at these from a DHS perspective and they are a great
> concept. I know Sun has had the boxes here in DC on tour and worth
> checking out. I believe FEMA was in process of looking into leveraging
> them for disaster command centers along with the military.
As a
ehalf Of
Lorell Hathcock
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 6:07 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center
That's the issue with these things. It seems that everyone likes the idea,
but no one wants to be the early adopters.
It was pointed out to me that
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 17:07 -0500, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
> - Disaster Recovery
I can see portable generators being part of DR, but not one or more
portable data centers. How long would it take you to start up a second
instance of all the hosts and devices you have in a data centers? Isn't
: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center
On 10/12/07, Lorell Hathcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
www.sun.com/blackbox
Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?
I hear that there's been one sighted in Houston. I would love to take a
tour.
Also, is anyon
On 10/12/07, Lorell Hathcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> www.sun.com/blackbox
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?
>
>
>
> I hear that there's been one sighted in Houston. I would love to take a
> tour.
>
>
>
> Also, is anyone using anything like this? It seems like they
> Subject: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center
>
> www.sun.com/blackbox
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?
SLAC has a blackbox (which is actually white)
installed, and running it packed with servers
for batch computing for the high energy physics program.
htt
14 matches
Mail list logo