Note that draft-daigle-rfc954bis-01.txt was approved and is
sitting in the RFC Editor's queue. It removes all of the policy
language in RFC 954, but is otherwise the same (and it
will likewise be issued as a Draft Standard, the current
status of RFC 954).
regards,
On 23 Sep 2004, at 16:36, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.php
There you go. They do this, they're in violation of RFC 954.
RFC 954 is a description of how one whois service, "running on the
SRI-NIC machine (26.0.0.73 or 10.0.0.51)". How can any other whois
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Matt Ghali wrote:
Oh look.
http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.php
There you go. They do this, they're in violation of RFC 954.
And there's already a blacklist ready and waiting.
-Dan
Does anyone else find this as offensive as I do?
matt ghali
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:19:19
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Matt Ghali wrote:
Does anyone else find this as offensive as I do?
matt ghali
I think at this point it becomes a matter of "if they're not listed,
blacklist them". It could potentially be a huge filter set, but there's
so much crap coming from that corner of the globe anyway
