NB> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 21:44:11 +0200
NB> From: Niels Bakker
NB> Axeda has no interest in finding prior art, they have an
NB> interest in people paying them money, preferably without
NB> having to go to court and possibly face defeat when their
NB> emperor turns out to have not been in full dr
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward B. Dreger) [Thu 05 Aug 2004, 19:28 CEST]:
[prior art]
> So why are Axeda and USPTO oblivious to all this?
The USPTO doesn't do due diligence research. This is only a small part
of the reasons for the current patent mess, however.
Axeda has no interest in finding prio
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
>
>
> > so ... mark lottor's your-machine-room-is-melting thermo+modem circa 1990
> > is what? prior art?
>
> Or the first project that I was senior systems analyst, back in 1979,
> all published and everything -- remote sensing in fa
SW> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:18:29 -0700
SW> From: Scott Whyte
[snip]
I think I'll patent SNMP traps as "low-bandwidth extensible DRM
technology". Redirected cron output, EDI, RSS, too, while I'm at
it.
Looking at archive.org, it seems adventnet.com had XML-based
notification before Axeda even
I believe it is time to file the patent on a process for the induction
of Oxygen for the purpose of converting molecular structure to energy
resulting in the expulsion of CO2.
--
-1-2-3-4-5-6-7
Eric Kimminau Email: [EMAIL
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
>
> so ... mark lottor's your-machine-room-is-melting thermo+modem circa 1990
> is what? prior art?
Or the first project that I was senior systems analyst, back in 1979,
all published and everything -- remote sensing in farmers' fields via
satelli
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
>
> so ... mark lottor's your-machine-room-is-melting thermo+modem circa 1990
> is what? prior art?
>
as is every cron job running quota checks & mailing the results to
system users.
so ... mark lottor's your-machine-room-is-melting thermo+modem circa 1990
is what? prior art?
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Scott Whyte wrote:
> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,757,714.WKU.&OS=PN/6,757,714&RS=PN/6,757,714
Would avoiding use of XML be enough to circumvent this?
-Dan
Thought this was relevent to nanog readership..
Abstract
The state of an apparatus is reported to a remote computer using an
embedded device in the apparatus. The embedded device detects the
state, generates an electronic mail message that reports the state
using a self-describing computer langu
10 matches
Mail list logo
